Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

JAHS

Will Paying Players Pay Off For Byu?

Recommended Posts

"A faith-based institution paying its players? Who would have thunk it?
With the new cost of attendance regulations, college athletic programs can begin paying athletes above the traditional scholarships in time for the 2015-16 academic year. As the Salt Lake Tribune reported, BYU is going all in by doling out $4,500 each academic year, a figure that is in the top 10 percent nationally."

 

http://www.ksl.com/?nid=272&sid=34533460

 

Our tithing dollars at work?

Share this post


Link to post

 

"A faith-based institution paying its players? Who would have thunk it?
With the new cost of attendance regulations, college athletic programs can begin paying athletes above the traditional scholarships in time for the 2015-16 academic year. As the Salt Lake Tribune reported, BYU is going all in by doling out $4,500 each academic year, a figure that is in the top 10 percent nationally."

 

http://www.ksl.com/?nid=272&sid=34533460

 

Our tithing dollars at work?

 

 

Probably not. Football is a money maker for college/university teams. Ticket sales and concession stands would more than cover any added expense.

Share this post


Link to post

Kudos to them for this. I hope other colleges follow suit.

Share this post


Link to post

This will be a very big positive for most all of the student athletes. However, for the small number of elite football players that BYU lacks in order to compete for New Years Days bowl games, I doubt that this will have much of an influence.

Share this post


Link to post

Our tithing dollars at work?

 

No, and considering what many student athletics programs waste their income on in order to remain non-profit this is a much better use of the money collected.

Share this post


Link to post

No, and considering what many student athletics programs waste their income on in order to remain non-profit this is a much better use of the money collected.

I agree. It coud be very helpful for BYU student athletes who are more likely to have already started a family while in school.

Of course they could give them jobs to earn the money like watching grass grow, or watering the lawns that have automatic sprinkling systems, or keeping the aligators out of the swimming pool. 

Share this post


Link to post

I agree. It coud be very helpful for BYU student atheletes who are more likely to have already start a family while in school.

Of course they could give them jobs to earn the money like watching grass grow, or watering the lawns that have automatic sprinkling systems, or keeping the aligators out of the swimming pool. 

 

Most college athletes do not have time to have a job if they are in the money-making college programs (football, basketball, etc.) It's more traditional to give their wife or girlfriend a university job.

 

College athletes have it rough unless they can transition to the professional leagues. Their degrees are generally simplified and not worth much. They do not have much time to study for the better degrees and if they are injured or do not make the pros they wasted several years of their life from an economic standpoint. I think all college athletes in big sports should be paid. They risk a lot and gain so little as it stands.

 

Edit: To be fair I consider both college and professional athletics to be bloated industries and I do not get the thrill of living vicariously by watching athletic games but I am clearly not in the majority.

Share this post


Link to post

A faith based organization realizing that it is unfair to profit off its athletes without fully compensating them?   I should hope the moral duty would be felt by all college teams.   And it certainly reduces the risk of a scandal or of an athlete going hungry or not being able to return home to see family.

Share this post


Link to post

Most "student athletes" are getting a great deal by being allowed to make what they want out of a free university education. I do not mind if the one half percent who can make money on endorsements, commercials, or jersey sales do so. Revise that. But paying every college football player money over and above full health insurance, room, board, and a free university education? I do not feel their pain.

Share this post


Link to post

Most "student athletes" are getting a great deal by being allowed to make what they want out of a free university education. I do not mind if the one half percent who can make money on endorsements, commercials, or jersey sales do so. Revise that. But paying every college football player money over and above full health insurance, room, board, and a free university education? I do not feel their pain.

 

This is unfair. They get room and board and get to go to class. Their class choices are limited by the need to train. If they are in the big sports that means training roughly 3 times a day. Most do not get into the pro leagues. Most do not have enough time to study STEM degrees or the big moneymaking degrees. Throw in that a bad injury might cost them their scholarship and that they are stuck with the costs of medical insurance and there is no equivalent of worker's comp. God help them if the injury is debilitating in the long-term. I don't think they need to be making millions or six figures but when young people are putting their health and future livelihood on the line for the entertainment of others and those in charge (coaches) are raking in million dollar salaries some basic compensation is deserved for those actually taking the real risks.

 

Don't even get me started about the long term dangers of American football. I am not sure if players are brave or just don't care.

Share this post


Link to post

This is unfair. They get room and board and get to go to class. Their class choices are limited by the need to train. If they are in the big sports that means training roughly 3 times a day. Most do not get into the pro leagues. Most do not have enough time to study STEM degrees or the big moneymaking degrees. Throw in that a bad injury might cost them their scholarship and that they are stuck with the costs of medical insurance and there is no equivalent of worker's comp. God help them if the injury is debilitating in the long-term. I don't think they need to be making millions or six figures but when young people are putting their health and future livelihood on the line for the entertainment of others and those in charge (coaches) are raking in million dollar salaries some basic compensation is deserved for those actually taking the real risks.

 

Don't even get me started about the long term dangers of American football. I am not sure if players are brave or just don't care.

 

The Nehor, its not bravery or carelessness. Its fun. Its camaraderie.

 

You don't even sound like you like football. It is the greatest team sport ever. Its beautiful in many respects.

 

So if you don't get to to study your STEMs, while playing college football, if it is unfair, I do not make a judgment. I know about football, but have never even heard of STEM. All I said, is that "I do not feel their pain." Sorry, but maybe they are like me and don't even know what they are missing. Nobody forces them. They can turn down the deal that offers football without STEMs. There is a reason why very few turn away from scholarship athletics and football scholarships in particular. It isn't because it makes them feel like slaves, or even unfairly treated, but because it is a privilege. It is truly a great deal. Pay them with money that should go to academics. Its fine. As a tax payer I know my money gets mostly wasted anyway. As far as taxes go, I don't care anymore. I'm just saying that if you give it to those who have college scholarships, it just makes a great deal unnecessarily better. Everybody already wants what they get now without more money being thrown at them. 

Share this post


Link to post

This is unfair. They get room and board and get to go to class. Their class choices are limited by the need to train. If they are in the big sports that means training roughly 3 times a day. Most do not get into the pro leagues. Most do not have enough time to study STEM degrees or the big moneymaking degrees. Throw in that a bad injury might cost them their scholarship and that they are stuck with the costs of medical insurance and there is no equivalent of worker's comp. God help them if the injury is debilitating in the long-term. I don't think they need to be making millions or six figures but when young people are putting their health and future livelihood on the line for the entertainment of others and those in charge (coaches) are raking in million dollar salaries some basic compensation is deserved for those actually taking the real risks.

 

Don't even get me started about the long term dangers of American football. I am not sure if players are brave or just don't care.

 

Your argument is very well spelled out in the documentary "Schooled."  It's very one-sided, of course, but it's a huge eye-opener. 

Share this post


Link to post

Your argument is very well spelled out in the documentary "Schooled."  It's very one-sided, of course, but it's a huge eye-opener. 

 

Never seen it. My knowledge comes mostly from friends involved years ago.

 

 

The Nehor, its not bravery or carelessness. Its fun. Its camaraderie.

 

That was the argument for Roman gladiatorial games too.

 

 

You don't even sound like you like football. It is the greatest team sport ever. Its beautiful in many respects.

 

I prefer rugby. The long term damage from getting your head smashed around is coming to light and it is not pretty. We already have smart athletes retiring early based on what is going on. I personally think there are other sports that have a lot less potential for brain damage.

 

 

So if you don't get to to study your STEMs, while playing college football, if it is unfair, I do not make a judgment. I know about football, but have never even heard of STEM. All I said, is that "I do not feel their pain." Sorry, but maybe they are like me and don't even know what they are missing. Nobody forces them. They can turn down the deal that offers football without STEMs. There is a reason why very few turn away from scholarship athletics and football scholarships in particular. It isn't because it makes them feel like slaves, or even unfairly treated, but because it is a privilege. It is truly a great deal. Pay them with money that should go to academics. Its fine. As a tax payer I know my money gets mostly wasted anyway. As far as taxes go, I don't care anymore. I'm just saying that if you give it to those who have college scholarships, it just makes a great deal unnecessarily better. Everybody already wants what they get now without more money being thrown at them. 

 

STEM stands for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. A kind of catch-all term for the technical degrees that tend to bring a hefty paycheck (except maybe pure math).

 

I don't think they feel like slaves either. The high of athletic achievement is intoxicating. I have felt it myself though with a lot less adulation then you get on a sports field. I just think they should be compensated for the risks they take and for the substantial likelihood that it will not go anywhere long-term. I don't see it as such a great deal. In just about every way an academic scholarship is better for your long-term future. Athletic scholarships are dicey and where there is risk there should be reward. If it is such a great privilege to be involved shouldn't their coaches be given bare-bones salaries or work just for the love of the game instead of raking in millions a year? Not to demean the advantages of having a good coach but they are not the ones on the field with the risks winning or losing.

Share this post


Link to post

Those who study pure math are well aware that it will never add up to much .

As for the OP , I am on the side of paying the athletes .I refer to the scripture > the laborer is worthy of his hire .

Share this post


Link to post

Those who study pure math are well aware that it will never add up to much .As for the OP , I am on the side of paying the athletes .I refer to the scripture > the laborer is worthy of his hire .

would this precept apply to other college sports?

Share this post


Link to post

would this precept apply to other college sports?

 

Yes.

 

Ps; As was said a by an infamous college basketball coach. The first two years he could keep the basketball academically qualifiied.

Share this post


Link to post

They only talked about football in the article. It would only seem fair that athletes in the other sports will also get paid?

Share this post


Link to post

If one participates in an activity that brings substantial revenue to the university, then payment should be provided. Someone on academic scholarship has to maintain good grades to renew said scholarship. In other words they are doing what they came to university to do. I will go so far as to suggest that a student who helps invent a new process in the chem lab which results in a profit to the university, should also have some compensation beyond whatever scholarship they might have.

Share this post


Link to post

Probably not. Football is a money maker for college/university teams. Ticket sales and concession stands would more than cover any added expense.

 

Many articles indicate that "football is a money maker" is a myth.  One article suggested that numbers found on FORBES and ESPN only apply to 8% of the college football programs.

 

Just for giggles, here are some number from 2008 regarding BYU as reported by ESPN

 

Revenue = 36,000,000

Exspenses= 33,000,000

 

Anyways, college football may pay for itself at some schools.

Share this post


Link to post

Many articles indicate that "football is a money maker" is a myth.  One article suggested that numbers found on FORBES and ESPN only apply to 8% of the college football programs.

 

Just for giggles, here are some number from 2008 regarding BYU as reported by ESPN

 

Revenue = 36,000,000

Exspenses= 33,000,000

 

Anyways, college football may pay for itself at some schools.

 

$3,000,000 is a lot of money. I'm not suggesting that student athletes get paid like the Pro's. I do think they should be compensated more that they are.

 

Anyways. My main thrust was that tithing isn't used to fund the BYU Football team.

Share this post


Link to post

would this precept apply to other college sports?

 

Only if they generate the kind of revenue that football does.

Share this post


Link to post

Many articles indicate that "football is a money maker" is a myth.  One article suggested that numbers found on FORBES and ESPN only apply to 8% of the college football programs.

 

Just for giggles, here are some number from 2008 regarding BYU as reported by ESPN

 

Revenue = 36,000,000

Exspenses= 33,000,000

 

Anyways, college football may pay for itself at some schools.

 

Would you mind posting the link to the ESPN article you've cited here? I'm wondering if the report you read is actually referring to the overall BYU athletics revenue and expenses, because even more recent data published by the US Department of Education (as recently reported here) indicates that BYU football revenue for 2012 = $22.4 million from which it posted a $7.41 million profit.  It seems that at BYU at least, college football does indeed pay for itself.

Share this post


Link to post

$3,000,000 is a lot of money. I'm not suggesting that student athletes get paid like the Pro's. I do think they should be compensated more that they are.

Anyways. My main thrust was that tithing isn't used to fund the BYU Football team.

My thoughts are, from an economic standpoint if something is paying for itself and has a considerable profit, then sure keep it.

As for paying extra stipends to football players, I would hope tithing monies are not used for it.

From a Gospel perspective of prudent living and not living beyond ones means, I do not accept paying football players more.

But the article suggested, pay more is a means of trying to stay relevant.

OKrahomer i think you are correct the numbers appear total athletic program

Share this post


Link to post

They only talked about football in the article. It would only seem fair that athletes in the other sports will also get paid?

I would argue it depends. In sports that consume only a few hours a day or less I think you are okay with making it unpaid as they are generally still competitive but not in a way that brings money to the school and the athletes do not have the sport consume their entire academic career.

Share this post


Link to post

From a Gospel perspective of prudent living and not living beyond ones means, I do not accept paying football players more.

Wouldn't this be more of an objection to the multimillion dollar coach salaries?

Share this post


Link to post
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By HappyJackWagon
      Apparently BYU has been instituting these changes for the past couple of years, striving to move away from "activities checklists" and reliance on GPA and ACT scores (only).
      The article discusses how BYU is looking to find people who better align with the school's/church's mission. That makes sense.
      I find this interesting and a bit disappointing but I'm curious what your thoughts are. I've heard the question asked many times, "Does BYU require seminary graduation?" This new approach doesn't really answer that question but it does require a recommendation from a seminary teacher. I'm assuming it's in addition to a standard ecclesiastical endorsement and it seems like maybe it's a bit redundant, or maybe BYU isn't as trusting of the bishop's endorsement. I don't know. But basing college admissions on a student's engagement in seminary at one point in time during that student's senior year doesn't seem all that helpful. 
       
      https://magazine.byu.edu/article/beyond-checkboxes-byu-admissions-changes/?fbclid=IwAR15MwtGDGSE2DuHeP9FtEaNCSnph7hB6OWRcqwMaDFSk6PqHFheaeLzXtI
    • By Five Solas
      Got back home last Sunday after 8 days in London, England, celebrating my 10-year wedding anniversary with my wife.  Our three kiddos stayed at home with her parents—which was awfully generous of them.  (Other guys may complain about their in-laws, but not I.)  It was a great trip, perfect walking weather, peak tourist season not yet started. 
      We stayed at The Grosvenor adjacent to Victoria Station, which meant we had pretty near the whole city within ~ 30 minutes via the Underground (and Buckingham Palace within a six minute walk).  And I’ll share one small observation with the board for any discussion:
      Aberrant theology notwithstanding, the Jehovah’s Witnesses work pretty dang hard.  
      A number of times we saw them working the street.  And unlike Seattle where they will occasionally occupy a corner & smile gently at passers-by—here they seemed to be anxiously engaged with the vast diversity of humanity that occupies greater London.  Yes, we saw a lot of old churches and even a new one that could have been an Acts 29 plant.  But in all our time, we never once saw any LDS missionaries. 
      Recently there was a thread about religious persecution in contemporary Russia.  And this has hit the JW’s hard—because they’ve worked vigorously to establish themselves after the fall of the Soviet Union and have built quite a presence (~100K active worshipers in Russia).   But on that same thread, we couldn’t even figure out how many LDS stakes there are today in Russia (somewhere between zero and three).  Some other stats were tossed about along with an LDS “Locator” app which, among other things, pointed the user to what could have been a boarded-up McDonald's.  After nearly three decades since the fall, LDS here don’t know or seem to care (but a few certainly enjoyed discussing/debating political aspects of Russia).  It’s a stunning contrast to all the fevered speculation when I was growing up (70’s – 80’s) about the missionary/membership opportunity for the LDS Church if Communism were to fall. 
      I realize it’s all anecdotal, and with a life-expectancy assumption of 110 for lost members, we can expect the LDS Church to continue to claim modest membership growth into the foreseeable future (loosing track of people makes *much* better numbers than knowing who actually dies or quits). 
      The question I have is this: Have we entered a period of retreat and retrenchment for the LDS Church where the focus will shift more to Utah and adjacent states (plus perhaps a few parts of the “third world” where record keeping and independent verification of membership will conveniently not be possible).  Even at the national level, we appear to see an example of retrenchment with BYU’s divorce from USAF ROTC.  And on the front page we have a thread about whether “slowing growth” makes any difference to the LDS Church and its adherents.  And again, the LDS here don’t seem terribly interested or concerned. 
      What do you think?  Has Mormonism peaked?  Any will LDS really care if it has?
      --Erik
      ______________________________________________
      You left
      Your tired family grieving
      And you think they're sad because you're leaving
      But did you see Jealousy in the eyes
      Of the ones who had to stay behind?
      --The Smiths "London"
    • By Five Solas
      Thinking about BYU losing the US Air Force ROTC program it has hosted, almost since the inception of the Air Force (as a separate service from the USAAC).  Although some will play down the move to UVU – I think this could prove a watershed moment for BYU and for LDS.

      For over half a century the Air Force played by the rules of the LDS authored “Honor Code” at BYU and found officers willing to work within its constraints.  In return, BYU supplied thousands of competent officers. 

      And whatever the exact equation of costs vs. benefits for Air Force officer recruitment/training, one thing is certain: The LDS Church and its flagship university aren’t as valuable as they used to be.  They used to be worth accommodating--and now they're not.  LDS influence stands diminished. 

      A couple years ago, Daniel C. Peterson wrote an article that was perhaps prescient—

      Growing up in the fifties and sixties, it was easy to assume that American society respected Latter-day Saints. We might be out on the theological fringe, regarded as a bit quirky, but American civic religion was at least theoretically pretty much on our side. For example, Americans seemed to honor ideals of faithful, heterosexual marriage, with fathers taking the lead and mothers caring for children. Society was, in other words, largely in sync with, and supportive of, fundamental, practical Mormon values. In fact, Mormons seemed quintessentially American — which, in the postwar era of the Pax Americana, benefited our church not only in the United States but in Europe and Japan.

      Today, though, Mormonism and Western society seem to be parting ways in crucial respects.

      What do folks think?  Is the Air Force ROTC departure from BYU related to a broader trend Peterson wrote about in 2015?  
      --Erik

    • By SeekingUnderstanding
      http://news.byu.edu/news/news-release
      This looks to be a huge step forward and I applaud BYU for it. It will be interesting to see what exactly an amnesty clause looks like.
      Duplicate topic
    • By HappyJackWagon
      I'm very proud of BYU today. The advisory committee worked quickly to make their recommendations and BYU has accepted all 23 recommendations though some of them will be phased in gradually. Among the immediate changes will be that survivors of sexual assault who report to the Title IX office will receive amnesty for other violations of the honor code that occurred near the time of the assault. This will encourage more victims to step forward and report their assaults which will in turn help BYU get rid of the perpetrators and provide greater security on campus and among its students. This is great news.
      https://news.byu.edu/news/news-release
×
×
  • Create New...