Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Is It Time To Change The Way We Do Sacrament Meeting?

Lifeless? Boring?

  • Please log in to reply
65 replies to this topic

#1 Alan

Alan

    Separates Water & Dry Land

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,944 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 09:53 AM

I wondered what people think of the way we currently "do" sacrament meeting. What I mean by this is the regimentation, the lack of spontanaity (sic), the dullness, the funeral durge type hymns (many of them), the frequently awful talks etc.

According to the D&C we should conduct our meetings according to the dictates of the Spirit, but I find in reality we don't do that. Is it time this was looked at?

 

Now, before anyone states the obvious, I am not talking about the centrality of the sacrament itself. That is taken as read. I'm talking about what happens next.

 

For example, should we encourage preaching rather than talks?

Perhaps more modern hymns and music should be introduced?

Perhaps we should not assign speakers all the time and just "let the holy spirit guide"?

 

I would be particularly interested to hear the comments of those who have experience of both LDS and other churches meetings, including converts who have gone either way.


Edited by Alan, 24 January 2014 - 09:54 AM.

  • 0

#2 Mola Ram Suda Ram

Mola Ram Suda Ram

    Ax Slinger after the order of RR

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,742 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 09:57 AM

Something should probably be done. Part of the issue though and I fully admit it is the attitude of the person attending. Most of the time I am fighting with kids and dozing off. Not at the same time of course. Currently, I realize that my time at church is, save for the sacrament only, I am not there for my self but for others including my kids. My time for my self was in my youth. So I try to have that attitude when I go. It does help but it doesn't solve the other issues that at times it is quite boring.


  • 0
"Mola Ram.... Mola Ram.... Mola Ram Suda Ram. Mola Ram.... Mola Ram.... Mola Ram Suda Ram." Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.

Dogs have more in common with mammals than they have in common with wolves.

#3 bluebell

bluebell

    Declares a Day of Rest

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,260 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 10:30 AM

I've been in a ward where the bishop very much let the spirit dictate.  We had lots of spontaneous talks and preaching.  It was the most awesome and spiritual ward i've ever been in.  It mirrored the bishop, who was the most spiritual man i've ever known, though he was far from perfect.  

 

And the music did not have to be changed because people sang the songs with the spirit, which is what is probably actually missing, and not modern music itself.

 

In my experience, when a ward's sacrament meeting get's off the tracks, its usually because the bishop has let it.  :pardon:


  • 2
"Be kinder than necessary, for everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle."

UMW always and forever.

#4 mfbukowski

mfbukowski

    Wittgensteinian Pot-Stirrer

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,410 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 10:35 AM

Well we need to hire some professional clergy to put on a good show for us, get some gospel music going and maybe start speaking in tongues.

 

And of course then we could pass the plate to pay for the performers.  No need for these amateurs who don't know what they're doing- we need some pros- that's what we need!

 

Maybe throw in some dancers and a free lunch too?   That'd bring 'em in!

 

The problem is those dang bishops just don't know what's important.  Entertainment is what it's all about!  Can't let folks sit back and think- keep it moving- that's what we need.


Edited by mfbukowski, 24 January 2014 - 10:36 AM.

  • 2
"I see Religion as creating a language to speak of the divine and sacred. Since I see creating this language as a creative act, ... creating a certain view of heaven and earth, a living 'image' of God and Man and their story, past, present and future." - Calmoriah

My Blog: Theomorphic Man http://theomorphicman.blogspot.com/

#5 mfbukowski

mfbukowski

    Wittgensteinian Pot-Stirrer

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,410 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 10:39 AM


I would be particularly interested to hear the comments of those who have experience of both LDS and other churches meetings, including converts who have gone either way.

Maybe we could have the bishop bless the sacrament by himself, with his back to the audience, and do it in a foreign language to spice it up a little.

 

Throw in some Gregorian chant and incense, and memorized prayers, always the same every Sunday.

 

Maybe that's the ticket!


  • 3
"I see Religion as creating a language to speak of the divine and sacred. Since I see creating this language as a creative act, ... creating a certain view of heaven and earth, a living 'image' of God and Man and their story, past, present and future." - Calmoriah

My Blog: Theomorphic Man http://theomorphicman.blogspot.com/

#6 sheilauk

sheilauk

    Member: Moves Upon the Waters

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 246 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 12:02 PM

Being a convert, and having been to a large number of services in a variety of Christian churches, an LDS meeting is no more or less boring than other churches!

 

In all seriousness, I don't find the LDS service all that different from others I've attended in the overall view of them.  I've even been to a church which relied on lay speakers for the most part as the minister was responsible for so many other churches, he could only visit each one once every 4-6 weeks.  It all depends on the speaker and the state of mind of the listener.  There are weeks when I'm bored and weeks when I'm engaged and the difference can be as much due to my frame of mind as to the speaker's ability to get my attention.  I have been just as bored (not) listening to a paid minister or preacher as to an LDS member.  Being paid to lead a congregation doesn't guarantee a good speaker nor does it guarantee that I'll be interested that week!  Many of the LDS hymns are familiar to me from other churches and I've heard them sung in a variety of good and not so good ways.  I also think that in my ward, the hymns are generally very well sung and not dirges.  In fact, our choristers insist on it as they have been known to stop us and make us start again when we sound truly awful!!  I suppose the other churches I've been too could be said to be conventional - I've not been to a spiritualist church or an evangelical one and all of them tend to be quite structured with only occasional spontaniety, for instance the Methodist church I went to favoured a lengthy set communion (sacrament) service which was recited by the Minister and congregation.  For me, that was a dirge and it negatively affected how I felt when taking communion.  For others, it was a real joy.  The LDS service suits me for the most part.  That said, I would like to see more short talks and more speakers after the intermediate hymn.  Unless its a really good speaker, a 15-20 min talk is just too long!  I get bored and the children get really restless.  I'd also like interaction with the audience to be more acceptable.  One really good preacher I experienced often went out into the congregation as he talked and asked questions and that was much more interesting and it kept you alert - you never knew if he'd ask you a question!

(sorry about the size of the letters - don't know what happened and this seems the best i can achieve)


Edited by sheilauk, 24 January 2014 - 12:05 PM.

  • 5

#7 Bob Crockett

Bob Crockett

    Separates Water & Dry Land

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,895 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 12:06 PM

I had an ancestor who was a bishop in Payson for 25 years.  Brigham Young canceled their Sunday services due to the threat of Indian attacks and then forgot to reauthorize them; apparently the ward went on for 10 years without services.


  • 3

#8 Tacenda

Tacenda

    “Earth laughs in flowers”

  • Limited
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,335 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 12:19 PM

I've been in a ward where the bishop very much let the spirit dictate.  We had lots of spontaneous talks and preaching.  It was the most awesome and spiritual ward i've ever been in.  It mirrored the bishop, who was the most spiritual man i've ever known, though he was far from perfect.  

 

And the music did not have to be changed because people sang the songs with the spirit, which is what is probably actually missing, and not modern music itself.

 

In my experience, when a ward's sacrament meeting get's off the tracks, its usually because the bishop has let it.   :pardon:

 Bluebell have you seen a difference in your new ward in Utah?  Is it a lot different than the one in North Dakota?  Is it different in the Mormon belt?  I'm just curious if Sacrament Meeting is different out in the mission field.  I don't get out much. 


  • 0
middlewayer

#9 Pa Pa

Pa Pa

    Shhh...Don't tell the anti-Mormons

  • Limited
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,234 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 12:22 PM

I wondered what people think of the way we currently "do" sacrament meeting. What I mean by this is the regimentation, the lack of spontanaity (sic), the dullness, the funeral durge type hymns (many of them), the frequently awful talks etc.
According to the D&C we should conduct our meetings according to the dictates of the Spirit, but I find in reality we don't do that. Is it time this was looked at?
 
Now, before anyone states the obvious, I am not talking about the centrality of the sacrament itself. That is taken as read. I'm talking about what happens next.
 
For example, should we encourage preaching rather than talks?
Perhaps more modern hymns and music should be introduced?
Perhaps we should not assign speakers all the time and just "let the holy spirit guide"?
 
I would be particularly interested to hear the comments of those who have experience of both LDS and other churches meetings, including converts who have gone either way.

If we ask for "Preaching" instead of talks, you will only hear from those trying to speak and act differently than they are, or those who excel will be the only ones asked. I grew up in an Old Fashioned Church. "Preaching" is not for the faint of heart.
  • 1
"So now it's just another show, leave them laughing when you go. And if you care don't let them know. Don't give yourself away" Joni Mitchell
There is no such thing as "Christian Tolerance"! Theo 1689 (CARMite)
See my Poetry Blog

#10 Avatar4321

Avatar4321

    Places Sun, Moon & Stars In The Sky

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,814 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 12:31 PM

I was under the impression that our talks were Preaching. Did I miss something?


  • 2
"It is extremely important for you to believe in yourselves, not only for what you are now, but for what you have the power to become. Trust in the Lord as He leads you along. He has things for you to do that you won't know about now, but that will unfold later. If you stay close to Him, you will have some great adventures. You will live in a time when instead of just talking about prophecies that will sometime be fulfilled, many of them will actually be fulfilled. The Lord will unfold your future bit by bit."- Elder Neal A. Maxwell

"If you live up to your privileges, the angels cannot be restrained from being your associates" - Joseph Smith

#11 strappinglad

strappinglad

    Senior Member: Divides Heaven & Earth

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 881 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 12:45 PM

Well, everyone KNOWS that Joseph established our sacrament service on the Presbyterian model. :vader: The changes over the years have been few. We once had a communal sacrament cup( lovely) and we knelt together for the sacrament, and the service was pretty well only attended by adults. Oh ya, and you could count on seeing the president of the church or an apostle quite regularly.
In my opinion, what with all the electronic ' noise' today, it might do us good to get used to a little boredom time once a week.
  • 1
Sometimes you have to make a decision in order to make a decision

#12 The Nehor

The Nehor

    Death, Destroyer of Worlds

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,232 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 12:48 PM

I was under the impression that our talks were Preaching. Did I miss something?

 

Nope, they should be anyways. I think the only reason we do not use the word preach much is that it has gotten a negative connotation.


  • 0
Twisting God's work into my own hellish, slithering, mutatious...thing.

I support NCMO.

We enter this world naked, screaming, and covered in blood...the fun doesn't have to end there...

#13 mormonnewb

mormonnewb

    Separates Water & Dry Land

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,061 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 01:23 PM

I'm a recent convert from the black baptist tradition and yes, LDS services are WAY different; but they have as many pluses as minuses.

I started a thread about the music a couple of weeks ago, so we won't go into that. Well, other than to say, that I've recently decided to wholeheartedly participate in the singing of our hymns and they're not THAT bad when they are being SUNG (as opposed to being mumbled) by the congregation.

As for the preaching, a professional preacher wouldn't put up with our kids running around and "disrupting" his/her message. Given that we keep our kids with us during sacrament (which I see as endearing), we are getting about the level of preaching that is called for.

As for the spirit, I agree with a previous poster, I find that normally depends upon ME. If I'm in the right frame of mind, the testimony glove can bring on the spirit. And if I'm the wrong frame of mind, then nothing can.

All of that being said, it might not be a bad thing to have a little variety from time to time or allow some local variations. I'm always amazed to hear people say that they love how they can go to an LDS meetinghouse anywhere in the world and have the SAME experience. How sad. If I went to, say, Brazil, I don't want to have an Arizona church experience. I could have had that without the 14-hour flight.

Edited by mormonnewb, 24 January 2014 - 01:58 PM.

  • 1

#14 Pa Pa

Pa Pa

    Shhh...Don't tell the anti-Mormons

  • Limited
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,234 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 01:33 PM

I was under the impression that our talks were Preaching. Did I miss something?

The key is to preach without sounding preachy.
  • 1
"So now it's just another show, leave them laughing when you go. And if you care don't let them know. Don't give yourself away" Joni Mitchell
There is no such thing as "Christian Tolerance"! Theo 1689 (CARMite)
See my Poetry Blog

#15 bluebell

bluebell

    Declares a Day of Rest

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,260 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 01:39 PM

 Bluebell have you seen a difference in your new ward in Utah?  Is it a lot different than the one in North Dakota?  Is it different in the Mormon belt?  I'm just curious if Sacrament Meeting is different out in the mission field.  I don't get out much. 

 

I haven't really noticed much of a difference.

 

The RS presidency was definitely a bit weird compared to what i'm used to.  I was never introduced or welcomed into the RS, and i had been attending for a month before any of them actually introduced themselves to me.  It was 6 weeks before i figured out which of the three was the actual president, and i only figured that out because i asked a sister i was sitting next to!

 

I didn't take it personally though.  We all have our strengths and our weaknesses in callings.  Plus, i might have shown up at a busy time for them, it's hard to say.

 

The bishop and his counselors are awesome though, and everyone else has been very friendly.  We are really enjoying being here. 


  • 3
"Be kinder than necessary, for everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle."

UMW always and forever.

#16 cinepro

cinepro

    It's pronounced "cinepro"

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,939 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 01:40 PM

The "problem" with our services is that we ask people to get up and give a talk with absolutely no training or guidance. Most people presumably figure out what they're supposed to do after attending enough meetings, but if we're learning only by what we see, then nothing will ever change.

For example, I've been asked to speak probably 15 times since I turned 12, and not once have they told me how long the talk should be. That's a pretty basic component of a public presentation, but I've never been told "Brother Cinepro, we would like you to speak two weeks from now, and your remarks should be about 15 minutes in length." I'm usually just given a general subject and date, and that's it. Based on the number of different wards I've been in, I'm assuming this is the general practice.  It's just odd to me that the Bishopric sits down at the start of the meeting, and they have 3 or 4 speakers lined up, and no one knows how long those speakers have prepared to speak.  It's just faith in the abilities of the last speaker to be flexible that we'll finish about 70 minutes later.

Since the Church has decided that nearly all of the "preaching" in our meetings will be done by random members of the ward (and visiting High Councilors), it is odd that we don't have a week or two each year in Sunday School or 5th Sunday where we are told what is expected for Sacrament Meeting talks, along with some general tips on how to prepare. At the very least, there should be handout with guidelines given with each assignment.


 


Edited by cinepro, 24 January 2014 - 01:42 PM.

  • 1
The LDS Stake Medium Council Blog

In spite of the world's arguments against the historicity of the Flood, and despite the supposed lack of geologic evidence, we Latter-day Saints believe that Noah was an actual man, a prophet of God, who preached repentance and raised a voice of warning, built an ark, gathered his family and a host of animals onto the ark, and floated safely away as waters covered the entire earth. We are assured that these events actually occurred by the multiple testimonies of God's prophets.

The Flood and the Tower of Babel, by Donald W. Parry, assistant professor of Hebrew at BYU, Ensign, Jan 1998, 35

#17 calmoriah

calmoriah

    Dulce de labris loquuntur, corde vivunt noxio.

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 42,588 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 01:43 PM

 

(sorry about the size of the letters - don't know what happened and this seems the best i can achieve)

Next time you reply look in the upperhand left corner of the reply icons and look for a icon that looks like a lightswitch.  Click on it.  All the coding will appear and you can delete it all and then click on the lightswitch again.  That should remove any accidental coding that has crept into posting for whatever reason.  If that doesn't work...someone else will have to think up something.  :)


  • 0
When you climb up a ladder, you...begin at the bottom...ascend step by step, until you arrive at the top...so it is with the principles of the Gospel--you must begin with the first...go on until you learn all the principles of exaltation. But it will be a great while after you have passed through the veil before you will have learned them. It is not all to be comprehended in this world. Joseph Smith
UMW forever!

#18 Kenngo1969

Kenngo1969

    God's Favorite Groveling Sycophant

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,553 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 01:45 PM

Could our sacrament meetings be improved?  Perhaps.  But we're all at different places along the path leading to Salvation, some of us have deep understanding of a few doctrines, some of us have shallow understanding of many doctrines, and most of us are somewhere in between.  The quality of some talks won't change until that changes, and that's not apt to change anytime soon: it's simply inherent in the nature of mortality.  And while many talks are for the benefit of the congregation, not a few of them are actually for the person speaking.  (I have experienced this myself, perhaps more than I would care to admit. ;))  Your mileage may vary, but I prefer to focus on what I can control more than on what I cannot.  I can only control the quality of my own worship and reflection. Even if I don't have any deep doctrinal insights served up to me on a silver platter in a given meeting, if nothing else, such meetings provide me with opportunities to reflect more deeply myself on the topic under consideration (as well as, perhaps, other topics, as the Spirit communicates unexpected things in unexpected ways). 


  • 2

Watch out for Stan!

"Read your Scriptures, strap on a bomb: It's all the same to us!"

—Kenngo1969, re Tal "The Talibachman" Bachman's comment to The Mormons documentarian Helen Whitney

 


#19 calmoriah

calmoriah

    Dulce de labris loquuntur, corde vivunt noxio.

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 42,588 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 01:45 PM

 Bluebell have you seen a difference in your new ward in Utah?  Is it a lot different than the one in North Dakota?  Is it different in the Mormon belt?  I'm just curious if Sacrament Meeting is different out in the mission field.  I don't get out much. 

It has never been much different for me, even in Russia save for feeling rather more intimate given that only 25 people or so were there.


  • 0
When you climb up a ladder, you...begin at the bottom...ascend step by step, until you arrive at the top...so it is with the principles of the Gospel--you must begin with the first...go on until you learn all the principles of exaltation. But it will be a great while after you have passed through the veil before you will have learned them. It is not all to be comprehended in this world. Joseph Smith
UMW forever!

#20 Duncan

Duncan

    Canadian Jester and Knowledge Navigator

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,251 posts

Posted 24 January 2014 - 01:52 PM

The "problem" with our services is that we ask people to get up and give a talk with absolutely no training or guidance. Most people presumably figure out what they're supposed to do after attending enough meetings, but if we're learning only by what we see, then nothing will ever change.

For example, I've been asked to speak probably 15 times since I turned 12, and not once have they told me how long the talk should be. That's a pretty basic component of a public presentation, but I've never been told "Brother Cinepro, we would like you to speak two weeks from now, and your remarks should be about 15 minutes in length." I'm usually just given a general subject and date, and that's it. Based on the number of different wards I've been in, I'm assuming this is the general practice.  It's just odd to me that the Bishopric sits down at the start of the meeting, and they have 3 or 4 speakers lined up, and no one knows how long those speakers have prepared to speak.  It's just faith in the abilities of the last speaker to be flexible that we'll finish about 70 minutes later.

Since the Church has decided that nearly all of the "preaching" in our meetings will be done by random members of the ward (and visiting High Councilors), it is odd that we don't have a week or two each year in Sunday School or 5th Sunday where we are told what is expected for Sacrament Meeting talks, along with some general tips on how to prepare. At the very least, there should be handout with guidelines given with each assignment.


 

 

 

one of my pet peeves is when they assign a general conference talk to someone. It's nice to hear talks from conference but I already know what Elder H. Ott Flashpepperpants of the Seventy thinks on the subject, I wanna know what you think. I get though that new people are nervous and don't know what's appropriate and that's fine but seasoned members? 


  • 1

"On a surprising number of occasions as a professor of religion at the Brigham Young University, I had returned missionaries object to something being taught that was new to them by saying, "How can this possibly be true? I have been a member of the Church my whole life, I am returned missionary, and I have never heard this before!" Thus their understanding has become the standard by which the truth of all things is to be measured"

Joseph Fielding McConkie, Between the Lines:Unlocking Scripture with Timeless Principles, 157



0 user(s) are browsing this forum

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users