tyler90az, on 24 May 2013 - 09:01 PM, said:
Are Our Spiritual Experiences Superior?
#21
Posted 13 hours ago
#22
Posted Today, 07:00 AM
TruthSeeker2013, on 24 May 2013 - 08:43 PM, said:
Sorry I misunderstood you. Can you explain what you mean when you say "only spiritual experiences that are true"? Do you mean that the Evangelical in my example would have felt feelings which are consistent with how spiritual experiences are described but that her feelings weren't in fact from the spirit? If so, how would she know if her feelings or yours are correct?
There is no such thing as "Christian Tolerance"! Theo 1689 (CARMite)
See my Poetry Blog
#23
Posted Today, 07:22 AM
#24
Posted Today, 07:46 AM
“When from Thy stern tutoring, I would quickly flee, turn me from my Tarshish to where is best for me. Help me in my Nineveh to serve with love and truth; not on a hillside posted, mid shade of gourd or booth. When my modest suffering seems so vexing, wrong, and sore, may I recall what freely flowed from each and every pore. Dear Lord of the Abba Cry, Help me in my duress to endure it well enough and to say, . . . 'Nevertheless.'” - Neal A. Maxwell
#25
Posted Today, 08:19 AM
TruthSeeker2013, on 24 May 2013 - 07:07 PM, said:
My question is this: How can one know whether these feelings are God testifying that something is true? Are there not many other Christians (and other religious people) who themselves feel these feelings about their own leaders, doctrines, etc. and thus believe that they are true? How can we know that our feelings are the correct ones from God and theirs are not?
(And I'm talking about things that are at odds, like Evangelicals feeling that God has told them through the spirit that the Book of Mormon is false and Mormons obviously feeling that the spirit has told them the opposite).
Consequently, should our quest for truth involve a greater focus on investigating the truth claims of religions rather than relying on the universally felt spirit of God?
http://dl.dropbox.co..._experience.pdf
A bit here:
Quote
Why make a model of religious experience? Ian Barbour writes that models are “organizing images used to order and interpret patterns of experience.” [1] Take one aspect of Mormon religious experience. How do you answer the question, “How are prayers answered?” Mormonism contains a far more comprehensive answer to that question than we generally realize. The stock answer, based on the D&C 9 revelation to Oliver Cowdery, is a good beginning, but unfortunately, we too often stop there. In this paper, I list scriptures that describe at least thirty different ways that prayers are answered. The Bible contains just a few descriptions; the modern scriptures contain many. Thirty different kinds of answers may sound like a lot to manage, but if you ponder them for a while, they do suggest patterns. The first pattern I noticed was the division between Feeling kinds of passages, such as D&C 9:8-9, and Thinking kinds of passages, such Alma 32:34. This natural complementary relationship between Thinking and Feeling aspects is a very useful beginning in ordering the kinds of experience described in these scriptures.
But that beginning leads me to take the question a step further—How do the kinds of spiritual experiences described in our scriptures compare to the kinds of spiritual experiences that underlie the spiritual experiences of mankind in general? How do we orient ourselves in relation to everyone else? We can start by looking at doctrinal differences, but that immediately defines boundaries and erects barriers. What do we have in common? Is there a common wine of core religious experience that remains fairly constant despite the differing doctrinal wineskins that we use to carry them in? Scholars of religion like Rudolf Otto, Ninian Smart, and Mircea Eliade have made significant studies of comparative religion. Where do we fit in their pictures?
Often our first attempts to orient ourselves place us squarely in the shoes of Joseph Smith when he began his religious quest. We have our minds disquieted by a confusing array of religious claims. The confusion is something that we all have to order and interpret at some point. It is difficult, if not impossible to communicate with those of differing views, or ever to take bearings on our own position without some place of fairly solid footing, a common ground upon which most people can at least comprehend. Ideally, we seek a vantage point that can both explain and order commonality, and that can also account for differences.
[1] Ian Barbour, Myths, Models, and Paradigms: A Comparative Study of Science and Religion (New York:Harper and Row, 1974), 7.
Alma seems to me to point directly at the final stage of the Perry Scheme, and not towards the absolute certainty that characterizes the first stage, and which soon works into a process of awareness, struggle, and either progress, or regerss.
But here is a link to a helpful introduction to the Perry Scheme:
http://dl.dropbox.co...erry Scheme.pdf
FWIW
Kevin Christensen
Bethel Park, PA
Edited by Kevin Christensen, Today, 09:04 AM.
#27
Posted Today, 08:27 AM
Answer: To me mine are superior
#28
Posted Today, 08:36 AM
ERayR, on 25 May 2013 - 08:27 AM, said:
Answer: To me mine are superior
I suspect most of us Mormons think that our spiritual experiences are superior to those of followers of other faiths -- that is why many find us religiously irritating....sigh. Missionary work is primarily successful if you locate people who are already "dry Mormons" and who are looking. It tends not to be successful, no matter how much praying the otherside does if they are not looking or are already strong in another faith -- does that mean the Lord is selective in who He gives the correct conclusions to? Normally, we pass it off as: 1) they didn't pray, 2) they didn't actually read the B of M, or 3) they were unworthy. We hesitate to conclude that they prayed and didn't get confirmation, because the B of M says they should have gotten confirmation.
Edited by Stone holm, Today, 08:37 AM.
#29
Posted Today, 08:53 AM
Kevin Christensen, on 25 May 2013 - 08:19 AM, said:
http://dl.dropbox.co...erry Scheme.pdf
FWIW
Kevin Christensen
Bethel Park, PA
My Blog: Theomorphic Man http://theomorphicman.blogspot.com/
#30
Posted Today, 09:04 AM
Stone holm, on 25 May 2013 - 08:36 AM, said:
Whoa hoss that is not what I said. Read it again. What I said is that to ME my experiences are superior. My experiences are just that, my experiences. They have no validity for others.
#31
Posted Today, 10:51 AM
TruthSeeker2013, on 24 May 2013 - 07:22 PM, said:
I appreciate your opinion and like what you're saying, but would you agree that the Church teaches otherwise? Would not the Church take the position that an Evangelical who believes she has been told by the spirit of God that the Book of Mormon is false has in fact not received that feeling from the spirit of God?
Wow, just realized it has been 34 years now...joined in (what was then) West Germany and sealed in the Swiss Temple...already had two children then, when they were brought back at 5 and 3, and laid their hands on ours on the alter...there was not a dry eye in the room. We had four couple friends with us and the sisters, including the sister Temple workers were bawling...so was mom and dad, one of the best days of my life!
Edited by Pa Pa, Today, 11:06 AM.
There is no such thing as "Christian Tolerance"! Theo 1689 (CARMite)
See my Poetry Blog
#32
Posted Today, 11:58 AM
In this community it is customary for the women to ask God who they should marry, not the other way around. One polygamous wife related her story that she had been praying to know who to marry and one day saw her future husband (who was already married to two other women) and at that moment she felt this incredible warmth fill her whole body and she KNEW without a doubt who she was to marry. This is the exact process and response we are taught as Latter-Day Saints to follow, so why did she receive an answer to enter into a polygamous relationship? This isn't an isolated event either, these powerful spiritual experiences are happening to millions of people all over the world every day.
#33
Posted Today, 01:03 PM
#34
Posted Today, 01:10 PM
Edited by rpn, Today, 01:11 PM.
#35
Posted Today, 01:22 PM
#36
Posted Today, 01:24 PM
Edited by Kenngo1969, Today, 01:25 PM.
"Sooner or later, there comes a point in a man’s life when he’s gotta face some facts. And one fact I gotta face is that, whatever it is that women like, I ain’t got it. I chased after enough girls in my life. I went to enough dances. I got hurt enough. I don’t wanna get hurt no more." —Ernest Borgnine as Marty, the title character in the 1955 film. (RIP, Mr. Borgnine.)
1 user(s) are reading this topic
1 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
-
Kenngo1969



