28 replies to this topic

[Daniel Peterson]

Here's my brief response:

http://www.patheos.c...eliza-wood.html

And there is a comments section.  Please join in.  Ms. Wood deserves to be thoroughly taken to the . . . er, woodshed for her sorry little article.

[Garden Girl]

Thank you, Dr. Peterson for sharing your reasoned reply to Ms. Wood's article.  And for the links...

GG

[ERayR]

Daniel Peterson, on 28 July 2012 - 09:20 AM, said:

Here's my brief response:

http://www.patheos.c...eliza-wood.html

And there is a comments section.  Please join in.  Ms. Wood deserves to be thoroughly taken to the . . . er, woodshed for her sorry little article.

Dan I posted a comment on your article.  For the record I thought it was good but, as I posted in the comments,  I think you missed the attempt to play on the fears and biases of her readers and the political implications.

[Pa Pa]

Daniel Peterson, on 28 July 2012 - 09:20 AM, said:

Here's my brief response:

http://www.patheos.c...eliza-wood.html

And there is a comments section.  Please join in.  Ms. Wood deserves to be thoroughly taken to the . . . er, woodshed for her sorry little article.

By people of her own faith would be best and the most effective, that would be best for both faiths.

[Storm Rider]

What I found odd in this story is the few individuals who commented as follows, I am an active Mormon and I must apologise for the terrible way Dan Peterson responded to you.  Your blog was accurate and I see no need for such a vitriolic response.  Who are these whackos?  You have got to be a very twisted individual to write these type of things.  How is one so committed to lying that they sell their soul to achieve the goal of destroying another human?  There is a special place in hell for these type of people; I pity them, but I will not feel sorry to see them burn for their choices.

[Pa Pa]

Storm Rider, on 29 July 2012 - 12:13 AM, said:

What I found odd in this story is the few individuals who commented as follows, I am an active Mormon and I must apologise for the terrible way Dan Peterson responded to you.  Your blog was accurate and I see no need for such a vitriolic response.  Who are these whackos?  You have got to be a very twisted individual to write these type of things.  How is one so committed to lying that they sell their soul to achieve the goal of destroying another human?  There is a special place in hell for these type of people; I pity them, but I will not feel sorry to see them burn for their choices.

Common tactic for those supporting her errors to claim to be an active Mormon. You could not be an "active Mormon" and not know the errors that she wrote. Plus Dan has stackers who follow him to every site or blog upon which he posts...his sin is being too effective at what he does.

[KevinG]

Wow her defenses include referencing CARM as an authority on accepting Mormons as traditional Christians.  Another HP super user keeps linking to UTLM.  All the time refusing to acknowledge LDS sources because they are "propaganda".

It is obvious she has no desire to get to know the Mormons, only to justify her own ignorance.

[altersteve]

Sometimes you just gotta walk away from people like her and don't look back. Having a discussion simply doesn't work with these people.

[Avatar4321]

It makes me amazed that people will still blatantly lie like that.