Abc News Reporting On Romney'S Cousin: The Church Is Chasing Me!
#1
Posted 26 April 2012 - 11:06 PM
A startling investigation into America's fastest growing religion and the former Mormon bishop who says he now wants to be President of the United States.
He's been described as the Republican Presidential candidate from central casting. Good looks, lots of money and powerful connections. But Mitt Romney is a Mormon and there are many, even inside his own political party, who say they simply can't vote for him. This week Four Corners presents a BBC investigation into an organisation that may yet destroy Mitt Romney's attempt to become the most powerful leader in the world.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the Mormons) has been described by some as the ultimate American religion. Based on the Christian tradition, it was founded by Joseph Smith Jnr in the early 19th Century in the United States. However, some claim the Mormons act more like a cult than a religion. BBC reporter John Sweeney investigates claims that the organisation brainwashes its members and targets people who leave the faith - keeping dossiers on them and telling their families, who remain in the church, to shun them.
The investigation looks at Mitt Romney's work as a Mormon bishop and includes a revealing interview with the politician's second cousin Park Romney, who says the church is a fraud and that after he left he was followed by people he believed were acting on behalf of the church.
The church denies it brainwashes people or forces them to shun members of their family, but that hasn't stopped many voters asking themselves why they would vote for a man who's involved in this religion.
"Mitt Romney and the Mormons", reported by John Sweeney and presented by Kerry O'Brien, goes to air on Monday 30th April at 8.30pm on ABC1. It is replayed on Tuesday 1st May at 11.35pm. It can also be seen on ABC News 24at 8.00pm on Saturdays or on ABC iview
I think ABC News is going to end up looking foolish by running a paranoid conspiracy story about a disgruntled ex-mo griping about doctrinal issues.
-Smac
#2
Posted 26 April 2012 - 11:14 PM
smac97, on 26 April 2012 - 11:06 PM, said:
-Smac
To be clear, it's "ABC News" Australia.
Maybe Pahoran can watch it.
Edited by cinepro, 26 April 2012 - 11:17 PM.
In spite of the world's arguments against the historicity of the Flood, and despite the supposed lack of geologic evidence, we Latter-day Saints believe that Noah was an actual man, a prophet of God, who preached repentance and raised a voice of warning, built an ark, gathered his family and a host of animals onto the ark, and floated safely away as waters covered the entire earth. We are assured that these events actually occurred by the multiple testimonies of God's prophets.
The Flood and the Tower of Babel, by Donald W. Parry, assistant professor of Hebrew at BYU, Ensign, Jan 1998, 35
#3
Posted 26 April 2012 - 11:15 PM
That particular exmo gripe reminds me of this video.
If my mental processes are determined wholly by the motions of atoms in my brain, I have no reason to suppose my beliefs are true ... and hence I have no reason for supposing my brain to be composed of atoms. - J. B. S. Haldane
#4
Posted 27 April 2012 - 06:55 AM
#5
Posted 27 April 2012 - 07:41 AM
Edited by Messenger, 27 April 2012 - 07:42 AM.
Goodbye! Remember, no "what if" threads allowed today!
#6
Posted 27 April 2012 - 07:43 AM
Messenger, on 27 April 2012 - 07:41 AM, said:
#7
Posted 27 April 2012 - 07:48 AM
Messenger, on 27 April 2012 - 07:41 AM, said:
You can't have political debate just for the sake of it though. (I think there might even be a thread pinned in the 'news' folder right now about this, but maybe i'm thinking of something different).
Edited by bluebell, 27 April 2012 - 07:48 AM.
UMW always and forever.
#8
Posted 27 April 2012 - 08:06 AM
GG
#9
Posted 27 April 2012 - 08:20 AM
We already do that through 40,000+ Missionaries.
#10
Posted 27 April 2012 - 08:32 AM
P.S.: And have I simply become too desensitized to how sensationalized the news has become worldwide, or (even with the degree to which it is sensationalized here) does such sensationalization nevertheless seem much more acute in other parts of the world?
P.P.S.: It's amazing, even with the amount of stuff that's already out there about the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, that any media outlet would still claim to have "startling" information about the Church; of course, I guess that's not hard ... if you're completely committed to reading nefarious motives into otherwise innocuous goings-on (or if that doesn't work, you could always just make stuff up ...)
Edited by Kenngo1969, 27 April 2012 - 08:37 AM.
"Sooner or later, there comes a point in a man’s life when he’s gotta face some facts. And one fact I gotta face is that, whatever it is that women like, I ain’t got it. I chased after enough girls in my life. I went to enough dances. I got hurt enough. I don’t wanna get hurt no more." —Ernest Borgnine as Marty, the title character in the 1955 film. (RIP, Mr. Borgnine.)
#11
Posted 27 April 2012 - 10:22 AM
Messenger, on 27 April 2012 - 07:41 AM, said:
Stories about political figures are not stories about politics. We have also given some leeway to stories about Mormons in politics. Integrity in tact.
#13
Posted 27 April 2012 - 04:45 PM
smac97, on 26 April 2012 - 11:06 PM, said:
I think ABC News is going to end up looking foolish by running a paranoid conspiracy story about a disgruntled ex-mo griping about doctrinal issues.
-Smac
Talking about ex-mos... Remember Morris "Mo" Udall who ran against Jimmy Carter? Anyone here born before then? From Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mo_Udall
"During the Michigan primary, the Carter campaign had Coleman Young, the mayor of Detroit, accuse Udall of racism for belonging to the LDS church, which at the time, did not allow blacks to serve in the church's priesthood (since changed in 1978 by LDS Church President, Spencer W. Kimball). Young's attack was at least somewhat unfair, since Udall had been a longtime critic of that church policy, and had ceased being an active member because of it."
He ceased being an active member... yikes! Mo couldn't win with that. (Good ole' Jimmy.)
Integrity was spoken here. Romney as a Republican has far more than a Mo-Democrat.
Mods: I hope that wasn't too political.
Edited by Tepui, 27 April 2012 - 04:49 PM.
#14
Posted 28 April 2012 - 05:21 PM
All due deference to the news networks, but they often get religion wrong. You can know everything there is to know about the Mormons in 6 little discussions, but the LDS still surprize me after 41 years of being one.
Edited by thesometimesaint, 28 April 2012 - 05:21 PM.
#15
Posted 29 April 2012 - 07:43 AM
Ares, on 27 April 2012 - 10:22 AM, said:
Stories about political figures are not stories about politics. We have also given some leeway to stories about Mormons in politics. Integrity in tact.
Integrity can be a lot like humility, you can say you have it, but then when you do, everyone does a double take. However, its entirely possible to say it, and still have it. In the end our actions define us, not our words.
Edited by Messenger, 29 April 2012 - 07:44 AM.
Goodbye! Remember, no "what if" threads allowed today!
#16
Posted 29 April 2012 - 10:55 AM
Either way, if he is or was followed, I have two theories. Theory One, someone connected to the Church did/is following him, because in England defaming a corporation is easy, and corps in England have and do file and win defamation suits. So maybe its a SMC member. Theory 2, he is/was being followed by the US Fed to determine whether he is a National security threat to his cousin running for Pres. Third theory, he is just a angry kook attempting to avenge himself.
Edited by LDS_RM, 29 April 2012 - 10:56 AM.
#17
Posted 29 April 2012 - 12:07 PM
#18
Posted 29 April 2012 - 12:53 PM
#19
Posted 29 April 2012 - 03:51 PM
LDS_RM, on 29 April 2012 - 10:55 AM, said:
Either way, if he is or was followed, I have two theories. Theory One, someone connected to the Church did/is following him, because in England defaming a corporation is easy, and corps in England have and do file and win defamation suits. So maybe its a SMC member. Theory 2, he is/was being followed by the US Fed to determine whether he is a National security threat to his cousin running for Pres. Third theory, he is just a angry kook attempting to avenge himself.
Fourth theory - he has good home teachers.
#20
Posted 29 April 2012 - 11:05 PM
“When from Thy stern tutoring, I would quickly flee, turn me from my Tarshish to where is best for me. Help me in my Nineveh to serve with love and truth; not on a hillside posted, mid shade of gourd or booth. When my modest suffering seems so vexing, wrong, and sore, may I recall what freely flowed from each and every pore. Dear Lord of the Abba Cry, Help me in my duress to endure it well enough and to say, . . . 'Nevertheless.'” - Neal A. Maxwell
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


This topic is locked

