I Hate Acronyms! Which Ones Do You Love Or Hate?
#1
Posted 23 February 2012 - 06:00 AM
HMI…Human Machine Interface.
I won’t go on to bore any who might see these…acronyms are the parents of the Texting World…something that has made our children lives such an abbreviated one that they can hardly write. ROFLOL! without exclamation points!!!! So I always feel like I am being yelled at. My last job had over 100 different acronyms…I had to put a list in my office to keep up.
BTW…did I mention I hate acronyms!
Here is a list…
http://www.netlingo.com/acronyms.php
There is no such thing as "Christian Tolerance"! Theo 1689 (CARMite)
See my Poetry Blog
#2
Posted 23 February 2012 - 09:09 AM
All acronyms are abbreviations, not all abbreviations are acronyms. People often confuse the two, using "acronym" as if it were a synonym for the broader term. The electro-tech industry is especially egregious, and the abbreviation TLA (and FLA) for "three- (or "four-) letter acronym" means three-letter abbreviation.
An acronym is an abbreviation, like NATO or NAZI, that we can (and do) pronounce as if it was a word. "ADA" (Americans with Disabilities Act) is not an acronym because no one says "Ada", we all say "Ay-Dee-Ay". "UN" is not an acronym: no one says "uhn".
In addition, there are "super acronyms". These are acronyms, one or more letters of which stand for another acronym. I have seen a third-level acronym, but only one.
Generally, I like acronyms. I do not like people who use them without a genuine reason to believe that their hearers/readers will know what they stand for. The internet, including this forum, seems to promote such "common" usage, and I have seen many that are really confusing.
If in doubt, use the full term. IMNSOHO*.
* Which is not an acronym: you cannot pronounce it as an ordinary English word.
Lehi— Walter Karp
#3
Posted 23 February 2012 - 09:50 AM
LeSellers, on 23 February 2012 - 09:09 AM, said:
All acronyms are abbreviations, not all abbreviations are acronyms. People often confuse the two, using "acronym" as if it were a synonym for the broader term. The electro-tech industry is especially egregious, and the abbreviation TLA (and FLA) for "three- (or "four-) letter acronym" means three-letter abbreviation.
An acronym is an abbreviation, like NATO or NAZI, that we can (and do) pronounce as if it was a word. "ADA" (Americans with Disabilities Act) is not an acronym because no one says "Ada", we all say "Ay-Dee-Ay". "UN" is not an acronym: no one says "uhn".
In addition, there are "super acronyms". These are acronyms, one or more letters of which stand for another acronym. I have seen a third-level acronym, but only one.
Generally, I like acronyms. I do not like people who use them without a genuine reason to believe that their hearers/readers will know what they stand for. The internet, including this forum, seems to promote such "common" usage, and I have seen many that are really confusing.
If in doubt, use the full term. IMNSOHO*.
* Which is not an acronym: you cannot pronounce it as an ordinary English word.
LehiQuote
Save Our Ship
Save Our Souls
Sink Or Swim
These are termed 'backronyms,' as explained below, and came into popular use AFTER SOS went into effect. In actuality, and as originally intended when SOS was introduced in 1908, the letters have no meaning.
SOS is a Morse "procedural signal” or "prosign." As the SOS signal is a ‘prosign’, its respective letters have no inherent meaning per se. In the simplest terms, SOS is a ‘SIGNAL’ indicating distress and the need for help, and not an acronym or abbreviation.
After SOS was first used by the steamship Arapahoe in 1909 (not the Titanic in 1912 as many people believe), people applied their own meanings to the letters. The most popular ones: "save our ship" and "save our souls." These are correctly termed ‘bacronyms.’
‘SOS’ was chosen because the three dots, three dashes, three dots are easy to transmit and not easily confused with other letters by the sender or recipients. With the advent of radios on ships beginning in the 1920s, ‘Mayday’ became, and still is, the International Distress Signal, but SOS served its purpose, for a while.
Edited by Pa Pa, 23 February 2012 - 09:53 AM.
There is no such thing as "Christian Tolerance"! Theo 1689 (CARMite)
See my Poetry Blog
#4
Posted 23 February 2012 - 11:11 AM
#5
Posted 23 February 2012 - 11:24 AM
MorningStar, on 23 February 2012 - 11:11 AM, said:
Lehi
— Walter Karp
#6
Posted 23 February 2012 - 01:06 PM
LeSellers, on 23 February 2012 - 11:24 AM, said:
Lehi
There is no such thing as "Christian Tolerance"! Theo 1689 (CARMite)
See my Poetry Blog
#7
Posted 23 February 2012 - 05:46 PM
#8
Posted 23 February 2012 - 06:49 PM
#9
Posted 23 February 2012 - 09:30 PM
Anyway, that's an acronym I dislike.
The content or message of any medium is about as important as the stenciling on the casing of an atomic bomb. ~ Marshall McLuhan, The Medium is the Message
#10
Posted 24 February 2012 - 02:04 AM
"First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win."
—Mahatma Ghandi
#11
Posted 24 February 2012 - 05:53 AM
Freedom, on 23 February 2012 - 06:49 PM, said:
There is no such thing as "Christian Tolerance"! Theo 1689 (CARMite)
See my Poetry Blog
#12
Posted 24 February 2012 - 05:55 AM
altersteve, on 24 February 2012 - 02:04 AM, said:
There is no such thing as "Christian Tolerance"! Theo 1689 (CARMite)
See my Poetry Blog
#13
Posted 24 February 2012 - 08:06 AM
— Walter Karp
#14
Posted 24 February 2012 - 08:37 AM
LeSellers, on 24 February 2012 - 08:06 AM, said:
Lehi
Edited by Pa Pa, 24 February 2012 - 08:37 AM.
There is no such thing as "Christian Tolerance"! Theo 1689 (CARMite)
See my Poetry Blog
#15
Posted 24 February 2012 - 09:24 AM
I hate the misuse of words. "Peruse" does not mean "scan" (however badly many people use it), it means to read deeply for understanding. Awesome means capable of inspiring awe.
Using words sloppily leads to misunderstandings. Misunderstandings lead to fights. No one wants that.
Lehi
— Walter Karp
#16
Posted 24 February 2012 - 09:33 AM
LeSellers, on 24 February 2012 - 09:24 AM, said:
I hate the misuse of words. "Peruse" does not mean "scan" (however badly many people use it), it means to read deeply for understanding. Awesome means capable of inspiring awe.
Using words sloppily leads to misunderstandings. Misunderstandings lead to fights. No one wants that.
Lehi
There is no such thing as "Christian Tolerance"! Theo 1689 (CARMite)
See my Poetry Blog
#17
Posted 24 February 2012 - 09:58 AM
Operation Iraqii Liberation.
and
AFCITHOLM
“A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.”
― Ralph Waldo Emerson
Edited by thesometimesaint, 24 February 2012 - 10:03 AM.
#19
Posted 24 February 2012 - 12:11 PM
#20
Posted 24 February 2012 - 12:25 PM
guitarist, on 24 February 2012 - 12:11 PM, said:
I have no patience at all for "Ebonics", for example. It's fine for people to use some sort of patois or "family language" for internal communication, but it just doesn't work for people outside the community.
Even in the most extreme situation, however, I still have to be able to understand the message. Your example seems to have had no message: the signal-to-noise ratio approached 0.
Lehi
Edited by LeSellers, 24 February 2012 - 12:27 PM.
— Walter Karp
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





