Jump to content


Photo
* * * - - 2 votes

“Yonder Is Matter Unorganized”; Why Joseph Was A Visionary.


  • Please log in to reply
166 replies to this topic

#1 Pa Pa

Pa Pa

    Shhh...Don't tell the anti-Mormons

  • Limited
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,224 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 01:11 PM

The doctors of religion in Joseph Smith’s day all believed (or taught) Ex nihilo creation. Also the six “days” to create all things. Joseph taught that matter has always existed, that it must be “organized”, also in scripture revealed by him that God was bound by his own laws, or that these laws were eternal.


As science has progressed we know that the earth is millions of years old and that it took millions of years to be “organized” from already existing matter that is billions of years old. The (our) universe did begin with a sudden “big bang” (if you will) but this type of “fusion” would require existing atoms to create. Then when God created man he did so (once again) with existing matter. He did not simply speak man into existence but formed man from the dust of the earth…”For dust thou art and unto dust thou shalt return”.
Even as the world has moved to a more scientific view of how the earth came to be, most faiths still see what Joseph knew as heresy.

Does this make him a Prophet, a visionary or just observant? Or does it make him all three?
  • 0
"So now it's just another show, leave them laughing when you go. And if you care don't let them know. Don't give yourself away" Joni Mitchell
There is no such thing as "Christian Tolerance"! Theo 1689 (CARMite)
See my Poetry Blog

#2 altersteve

altersteve

    Brings Forth Plants

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,794 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 01:16 PM

The doctors of religion in Joseph Smith’s day all believed (or taught) Ex nihilo creation. Also the six “days” to create all things. Joseph taught that matter has always existed, that it must be “organized”, also in scripture revealed by him that God was bound by his own laws, or that these laws were eternal.


As science has progressed we know that the earth is millions of years old and that it took millions of years to be “organized” from already existing matter that is billions of years old. The (our) universe did begin with a sudden “big bang” (if you will) but this type of “fusion” would require existing atoms to create. Then when God created man he did so (once again) with existing matter. He did not simply speak man into existence but formed man from the dust of the earth…”For dust thou art and unto dust thou shalt return”.
Even as the world has moved to a more scientific view of how the earth came to be, most faiths still see what Joseph knew as heresy.

Does this make him a Prophet, a visionary or just observant? Or does it make him all three?

All three, I say.

Was he the only religious leader at the time who was teaching the idea of matter being organized rather than created ex nihilo?
  • 0

"First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win."
—Mahatma Ghandi


#3 Pa Pa

Pa Pa

    Shhh...Don't tell the anti-Mormons

  • Limited
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,224 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 01:25 PM

All three, I say.

Was he the only religious leader at the time who was teaching the idea of matter being organized rather than created ex nihilo?

This is where I was hoping others could help expand my comments. Did he have others in his day...don't know. I am sure men of science were, not sure about other church leaders of other faiths.
  • 0
"So now it's just another show, leave them laughing when you go. And if you care don't let them know. Don't give yourself away" Joni Mitchell
There is no such thing as "Christian Tolerance"! Theo 1689 (CARMite)
See my Poetry Blog

#4 Rob Bowman

Rob Bowman

    Boldly going where no evangelical apologist has gone before

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,663 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 03:07 PM

Many religious teachers before Joseph Smith denied creation ex nihilo. An excellent example, and one that is quite relevant in this context, is Emanuel Swedenborg. "Swedenborg unequivocally denies creation ex nihilo" (Emanuel Swedenborg, Divine Love and Wisdom, trans. George F. Dole, intro. Gregory R. Johnson (Swedenborg Foundation, 2003), 27 (see there for direct quotations from the book). This is not the only similarity between Swedenborg's doctrine and Joseph's Smith's. Here are some additional similarities I have noted:
  • There are three heavens likened to the sun, moon, and stars; the highest of these heavens is the celestial heaven.
  • The celestial kingdom itself has three divisions.
  • Marriage in or for heaven is necessary to attain life in the celestial heaven.
  • Priestly robes are worn in the marriage for heavenly life.
  • The world depends on a balance or equilibrium between opposing forces (spiritual—physical, good—evil).
  • God is (a) man; all angels and humans are created in the image of his divine likeness.Physical things in this world correspond in some way to spiritual realities.
I don't claim that Joseph got these ideas directly from Swedenborg or even from Swedenborgians, though that is possible. I do think, however, that the evidence shows that such ideas were floating around in Joseph's culture and he could have picked them up in any number of ways. He didn't need to read Swedenborg to be dependent on him or others, indirectly, for these ideas. I also don't claim that there is no difference between Joseph Smith's and Swedenborg's doctrines. They obviously differed on many things.
  • 0
Rob Bowman
Director of Research, Institute for Religious Research
"BYU faculty members do not speak for the church."--Michael Purdy, LDS Church spokesman.

#5 KevinG

KevinG

    Outspoken zealot of moderation

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,456 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 03:11 PM

Prophetic knowledge isn't created ex nihilo either. If Joseph was privy to the Swedenborgians teachings while he was busy being chased from state to state with his people... He still knew the difference between a popular and widely believed untruth and a rare eternal truth.
  • 0
Please ask me what I believe before telling me what I believe. Hint- start here: http://lds.org/scriptures/

#6 Rob Bowman

Rob Bowman

    Boldly going where no evangelical apologist has gone before

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,663 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 03:18 PM

DaddyG,

You wrote:

Prophetic knowledge isn't created ex nihilo either. If Joseph was privy to the Swedenborgians teachings while he was busy being chased from state to state with his people... He still knew the difference between a popular and widely believed untruth and a rare eternal truth.


I was responding to Pa Pa's statement, "The doctors of religion in Joseph Smith’s day all believed (or taught) Ex nihilo creation," which he later qualified by saying that he didn't know if any of them taught otherwise. The fact that a great deal of Joseph Smith's "restoration" appears to have been drawn from the smorgasbord of religious ideas popular in the early nineteenth century at least raises some legitimate questions about his claim to have restored the true church and full gospel.
  • 0
Rob Bowman
Director of Research, Institute for Religious Research
"BYU faculty members do not speak for the church."--Michael Purdy, LDS Church spokesman.

#7 KevinG

KevinG

    Outspoken zealot of moderation

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,456 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 03:22 PM

Any restoration would appear to be drawn from a smorgasbord of religious ideas given those ideas came from a common source. I'm just keeping Josephs critics honest.

I'm sure there have been those with legitimate questions for Christ and all of His prophets from the beginning. All the more reason for seeking personal revelation in these matters.
  • 2
Please ask me what I believe before telling me what I believe. Hint- start here: http://lds.org/scriptures/

#8 Vance

Vance

    Chief Pharisee and Vindictive Goat

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,372 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 03:24 PM

The fact that a great deal of Joseph Smith's "restoration" appears to have been drawn from the smorgasbord of religious ideas popular in the early nineteenth century at least raises some legitimate questions about his claim to have restored the true church and full gospel.

Bowman, you do have a way of over stating things.

You made this assertion without providing any evidence to back it up. That means that all I need to do to answer this criticism adequately is simply to deny it. I deny it.


Edited by Vance, 22 November 2011 - 03:25 PM.

  • 0
"Remember kids! In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant." Stephen Colbert

"Because some people need to be dealt with reality, they have been coddled their whole lives, and when they're morons I have the guts and the compassion to let them know that they're morons." Mark Levin.

"Vance is truly the devil's right hand man and his multiplicity of sins testifies to that." & "Your heart is truly filled with evil, a true thistle through and through." Echo of the "truth in love ministry".

#9 KevinG

KevinG

    Outspoken zealot of moderation

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,456 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 03:29 PM

The fact that a great deal of mormon focused "ministries" appear to have been drawn from the smorgasbord of anti-mormon ideas popular in the early nineteenth century at least raises some legitimate questions about the claim to have scholarly knowledge about the Latter-day Saints.

...all I can say is that Joseph must have had one heck of a library to have drawn on during his early years. Perahps he was granted a celestial Iphone and had access to Google?
  • 0
Please ask me what I believe before telling me what I believe. Hint- start here: http://lds.org/scriptures/

#10 Vance

Vance

    Chief Pharisee and Vindictive Goat

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,372 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 03:33 PM

By assimilating a great deal of the popular ideas of his time, you would have thought he would have been more popular than he was.

You made this assertion without providing any evidence to back it up. That means that all I need to do to answer this criticism adequately is simply to deny it. I deny it.


Edited by Vance, 22 November 2011 - 03:34 PM.

  • 2
"Remember kids! In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant." Stephen Colbert

"Because some people need to be dealt with reality, they have been coddled their whole lives, and when they're morons I have the guts and the compassion to let them know that they're morons." Mark Levin.

"Vance is truly the devil's right hand man and his multiplicity of sins testifies to that." & "Your heart is truly filled with evil, a true thistle through and through." Echo of the "truth in love ministry".

#11 Gervin

Gervin

    Separates Water & Dry Land

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,804 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 03:36 PM

...all I can say is that Joseph must have had one heck of a library to have drawn on during his early years. Perahps he was granted a celestial Iphone and had access to Google?

Maybe not a heck of a library, but a library. Hasn't it been shown that Swedenborg's "Heaven and Hell and Its Wonders" was in Smith's hometown library as early as 1817?
  • 0

#12 KevinG

KevinG

    Outspoken zealot of moderation

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,456 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 03:39 PM

Maybe not a heck of a library, but a library. Hasn't it been shown that Swedenborg's "Heaven and Hell and Its Wonders" was in Smith's hometown library as early as 1817?


Check their computer and see when he checked it out.

I didn't say he couldn't have know about their ideas. I did say he knew the truth when he heard it- that is the role of a Prophet.
  • 0
Please ask me what I believe before telling me what I believe. Hint- start here: http://lds.org/scriptures/

#13 altersteve

altersteve

    Brings Forth Plants

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,794 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 03:55 PM

Many religious teachers before Joseph Smith denied creation ex nihilo. An excellent example, and one that is quite relevant in this context, is Emanuel Swedenborg. "Swedenborg unequivocally denies creation ex nihilo" (Emanuel Swedenborg, Divine Love and Wisdom, trans. George F. Dole, intro. Gregory R. Johnson (Swedenborg Foundation, 2003), 27 (see there for direct quotations from the book). This is not the only similarity between Swedenborg's doctrine and Joseph's Smith's. Here are some additional similarities I have noted:

  • There are three heavens likened to the sun, moon, and stars; the highest of these heavens is the celestial heaven.
  • The celestial kingdom itself has three divisions.
  • Marriage in or for heaven is necessary to attain life in the celestial heaven.
  • Priestly robes are worn in the marriage for heavenly life.
  • The world depends on a balance or equilibrium between opposing forces (spiritual—physical, good—evil).
  • God is (a) man; all angels and humans are created in the image of his divine likeness.Physical things in this world correspond in some way to spiritual realities.
I don't claim that Joseph got these ideas directly from Swedenborg or even from Swedenborgians, though that is possible. I do think, however, that the evidence shows that such ideas were floating around in Joseph's culture and he could have picked them up in any number of ways. He didn't need to read Swedenborg to be dependent on him or others, indirectly, for these ideas. I also don't claim that there is no difference between Joseph Smith's and Swedenborg's doctrines. They obviously differed on many things.

None of this is an issue for Latter-day Saints. We accept that God reveals truths to all people, and I, personally, have no problem believing that Swedenborg had some divine inspiration in developing his theology about heaven.
  • 4

"First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win."
—Mahatma Ghandi


#14 Ares

Ares

    god of war

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,000,708 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 03:56 PM

By assimilating a great deal of the popular ideas of his time, you would have thought he would have been more popular than he was.


Rob denied you permission to use his quote in your signature line. Please don't repeat it in every reply to him.
This is a Mormon dialogue and discussion board, not a misrepresent, demonize and debate board. Please learn the difference before posting.

#15 Vance

Vance

    Chief Pharisee and Vindictive Goat

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,372 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 04:11 PM


Rob denied you permission to use his quote in your signature line. Please don't repeat it in every reply to him.

It is not in my signature line.
  • 0
"Remember kids! In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant." Stephen Colbert

"Because some people need to be dealt with reality, they have been coddled their whole lives, and when they're morons I have the guts and the compassion to let them know that they're morons." Mark Levin.

"Vance is truly the devil's right hand man and his multiplicity of sins testifies to that." & "Your heart is truly filled with evil, a true thistle through and through." Echo of the "truth in love ministry".

#16 Ares

Ares

    god of war

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,000,708 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 04:19 PM

It is not in my signature line.


Don't try to skirt the rules by using it in every post. That is bad form.
This is a Mormon dialogue and discussion board, not a misrepresent, demonize and debate board. Please learn the difference before posting.

#17 Mariner

Mariner

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 419 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 05:34 PM

None of this is an issue for Latter-day Saints. We accept that God reveals truths to all people, and I, personally, have no problem believing that Swedenborg had some divine inspiration in developing his theology about heaven.


Perhaps Joseph Smith, Brigham Young and Joseph Fielding Smith should have paid closer attention to Swedenborg. We have instead the following explanation regarding the creation and history of the Earth according to revealed Kolob Cosmology.

President Joseph Fielding Smith stated that in this verse the Lord “revealed to Abraham that Adam was subject to Kolob’s time before his transgression.”

According to President Brigham Young, Abraham 5:13 [Abr. 5:13] also means that before the Fall of Adam, the earth was near the very throne of God. But when the Fall occurred, the earth literally fell or moved from the physical presence of God to its present position in our solar system. When all the effects of the Fall of Adam are finally overcome, the earth will literally move back into the presence of God.

Here are President Young’s words: “When the earth was framed and brought into existence and man was placed upon it, it was near the throne of our Father in heaven. … But when man fell, the earth fell into space, and took up its abode in this planetary system. … This is the glory the earth came from, and when it is glorified it will return again unto the presence of the Father, and it will dwell there, and these intelligent beings that I am looking at, if they live worthy of it, will dwell upon this earth.”


No, I am not kidding. This bit of visionary cosmology is from Joseph Smith's Book of Abraham by way of the Ensign.

http://lds.org/ensig...e-book?lang=eng

Edited by Mariner, 22 November 2011 - 05:49 PM.

  • 0

#18 Kenngo1969

Kenngo1969

    God's Favorite Groveling Sycophant

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,536 posts

Posted 22 November 2011 - 06:19 PM

The fact that a great deal of mormon focused "ministries" appear to have been drawn from the smorgasbord of anti-mormon ideas popular in the early nineteenth century at least raises some legitimate questions about the claim to have scholarly knowledge about the Latter-day Saints.

...all I can say is that Joseph must have had one heck of a library to have drawn on during his early years. Perahps he was granted a celestial Iphone and had access to Google?


Bill Hamblin once said that he was working on an intellectual biography of Joseph Smith, Joseph Smith: The Cambridge Years. ;)
  • 0

Watch out for Stan!

"Read your Scriptures, strap on a bomb: It's all the same to us!"

—Kenngo1969, re Tal "The Talibachman" Bachman's comment to The Mormons documentarian Helen Whitney

 


#19 Pa Pa

Pa Pa

    Shhh...Don't tell the anti-Mormons

  • Limited
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,224 posts

Posted 23 November 2011 - 05:10 AM

Many religious teachers before Joseph Smith denied creation ex nihilo. An excellent example, and one that is quite relevant in this context, is Emanuel Swedenborg. "Swedenborg unequivocally denies creation ex nihilo" (Emanuel Swedenborg, Divine Love and Wisdom, trans. George F. Dole, intro. Gregory R. Johnson (Swedenborg Foundation, 2003), 27 (see there for direct quotations from the book). This is not the only similarity between Swedenborg's doctrine and Joseph's Smith's. Here are some additional similarities I have noted:

  • There are three heavens likened to the sun, moon, and stars; the highest of these heavens is the celestial heaven.
  • The celestial kingdom itself has three divisions.
  • Marriage in or for heaven is necessary to attain life in the celestial heaven.
  • Priestly robes are worn in the marriage for heavenly life.
  • The world depends on a balance or equilibrium between opposing forces (spiritual—physical, good—evil).
  • God is (a) man; all angels and humans are created in the image of his divine likeness.Physical things in this world correspond in some way to spiritual realities.
I don't claim that Joseph got these ideas directly from Swedenborg or even from Swedenborgians, though that is possible. I do think, however, that the evidence shows that such ideas were floating around in Joseph's culture and he could have picked them up in any number of ways. He didn't need to read Swedenborg to be dependent on him or others, indirectly, for these ideas. I also don't claim that there is no difference between Joseph Smith's and Swedenborg's doctrines. They obviously differed on many things.

Forgive me, and I say this with a due respect. But binging up a contemporary of Joseph somewhere in the world just plays back into the "Joseph the Sponge" argument that "he never had an original thought in his life".

Edited by Pa Pa, 23 November 2011 - 05:13 AM.

  • 0
"So now it's just another show, leave them laughing when you go. And if you care don't let them know. Don't give yourself away" Joni Mitchell
There is no such thing as "Christian Tolerance"! Theo 1689 (CARMite)
See my Poetry Blog

#20 Rob Bowman

Rob Bowman

    Boldly going where no evangelical apologist has gone before

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,663 posts

Posted 23 November 2011 - 06:16 AM

Pa Pa,

You wrote:

Forgive me, and I say this with a due respect. But binging up a contemporary of Joseph somewhere in the world just plays back into the "Joseph the Sponge" argument that "he never had an original thought in his life".


Well, that wasn't my argument or claim. Joseph Smith did end up developing a very original theology. The notion that the Christian God progressed from a mortal man to a God and that we can do the same certainly qualifies as original. But you raised the question of whether his denial of creation ex nihilo was unprecedented among religious teachers of his era (actually, at first you simply asserted that it was), and I showed that it was not. I further showed that the Swedenborgian influence was credible by listing several other doctrinal similarities between the two.
  • 0
Rob Bowman
Director of Research, Institute for Religious Research
"BYU faculty members do not speak for the church."--Michael Purdy, LDS Church spokesman.


0 user(s) are browsing this forum

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users