Dunamis Posted October 25, 2004 Share Posted October 25, 2004 You write very interesting posts, Bammer. I think I will put you on the queue just so I don't miss anymore of them. Link to comment
SouthBayMC Posted October 25, 2004 Share Posted October 25, 2004 Some participants on this board continue to ask and yawn for an example of a single deception on the part of FARMS regarding their review of Grant Palmer's Insider's View of Mormon Origins book. An ingredient of deception requires intent on the part of the purported deceiver [in this case Jim Allen], which I don Link to comment
mormon fool Posted October 25, 2004 Share Posted October 25, 2004 The only way Palmer's argument works is stressing the "principal ancestor" introduction. You write that his book does not preclude that there were others present, but his argument is much weaker when this is considered. If we imagine a more limited population or a culture that merged into another one, then the lack of evidence in the areas that Palmer brings up are far less problematic. So Palmer has in this instance failed to acknowledge an already answered point. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.