President Packer's Christmastime talk in his home ward
#1
Posted 27 December 2010 - 11:29 AM
I thought the board might be interested in the Church News report of his talk.
Nobody gives you all the facts all at once, leastwise anti-Mormons and hostile critics. If selective focus or emphasis amounts to deceit, they are the worst of offenders.
If I detest anything as virulently as anti-Mormons obviously detest Mormonism, feel free to label me as "anti-" the thing I detest. I won't mind in the least.
An author who undertakes to criticize publicly another's religious faith and practice has the obligation, in the first instance, to understand it.
... and the anti-Mormon saith unto them: I am no anti-Mormon, for there is none — and thus he whispereth in their ears.
#2
Posted 27 December 2010 - 12:31 PM
Scott Lloyd, on 27 December 2010 - 11:29 AM, said:
I thought the board might be interested in the Church News report of his talk.
Also interesting was the statement, of course consistent with established doctrine, was that there was "no beginning and no end". That is a very straightforward statement which clearly separates us from Creedal Christians.
Also heart warming that Sister Packer complimented the Deacons. They won't forget that one!
I can't imagine what it would be like to be Elder Packer's bishop! Yikes!
Edited by mfbukowski, 27 December 2010 - 12:31 PM.
My Blog: Theomorphic Man http://theomorphicman.blogspot.com/
#3
Posted 27 December 2010 - 01:23 PM
Also, the expression about the view of eternity that prophets and apostles have gave me pause. It seemed that President Packer was saying about as much as he appropriately could on that subject without going into further detail.
Nobody gives you all the facts all at once, leastwise anti-Mormons and hostile critics. If selective focus or emphasis amounts to deceit, they are the worst of offenders.
If I detest anything as virulently as anti-Mormons obviously detest Mormonism, feel free to label me as "anti-" the thing I detest. I won't mind in the least.
An author who undertakes to criticize publicly another's religious faith and practice has the obligation, in the first instance, to understand it.
... and the anti-Mormon saith unto them: I am no anti-Mormon, for there is none — and thus he whispereth in their ears.
#4
Posted 27 December 2010 - 01:26 PM
mfbukowski, on 27 December 2010 - 12:31 PM, said:
He is my Lord. He is my Life. He is all I desire to be.
Speaking against the NATURE of sin: To the last I grapple with thee,
From Hell's Heart I stab thee; For Hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee...
#5
Posted 27 December 2010 - 04:16 PM
Ahab, on 27 December 2010 - 01:26 PM, said:
I used to know a fellow who was at one time President Joseph Fielding Smith's home teacher. This teenager at the time went out and had to teach Pres. Smith the article that he had written so what is this kid going to say, but after it was all over Pres. Smith said that it was nice to hear how what he wrote was being received by members
President George Q. Cannon
(Oct. 6, 1896, DW 53:610)
#6
Posted 27 December 2010 - 04:47 PM
"...I know him when I see him..."
Significant.
Edited by ERMD, 27 December 2010 - 04:48 PM.
#7
Posted 27 December 2010 - 08:27 PM
What's he talking about - almost all of Christmas is pagan; I'm curious what Pres. Packer finds to be creeping in...
H.
We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. Therefore, to the same natural effects we must, so far as possible, assign the same causes. --Sir Isaac Newton
Entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity --Father William of Ockham
#8
Posted 27 December 2010 - 08:33 PM
Scott Lloyd, on 27 December 2010 - 01:23 PM, said:
I found that striking, too, and I find myself asking the question, "Why not reveal more?" If the prophets and apostles have this view of eternity, wouldn't it make sense to share it with mankind, and not simply reveal 'teasers'?
H.
We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. Therefore, to the same natural effects we must, so far as possible, assign the same causes. --Sir Isaac Newton
Entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity --Father William of Ockham
#9
Posted 27 December 2010 - 09:20 PM
#10
Posted 27 December 2010 - 11:49 PM
LDSToronto, on 27 December 2010 - 08:33 PM, said:
H.
I am convinced that is for two reasons:
1. If we do not get it the same way he got it, we will not be able to hold onto it -- or appreciate it
2. That the world would trample it under their feet, to their own detriment
With regard to #1, see this.
Quote
What we receive without effort, we only lightly esteem.
My personal blog | My YouTube Channel | Linked-In Profile | My LDS Profile
Twitter: @IWasAboutToSay
#11
Posted 28 December 2010 - 10:31 AM
Stargazer, on 27 December 2010 - 11:49 PM, said:
1. If we do not get it the same way he got it, we will not be able to hold onto it -- or appreciate it
2. That the world would trample it under their feet, to their own detriment
With regard to #1, see this.
What we receive without effort, we only lightly esteem.
To this I would add the citation from 1 Corinthians 2:11 (Joseph Smith Translation):
Quote
Also, verse 14,
Quote
Nobody gives you all the facts all at once, leastwise anti-Mormons and hostile critics. If selective focus or emphasis amounts to deceit, they are the worst of offenders.
If I detest anything as virulently as anti-Mormons obviously detest Mormonism, feel free to label me as "anti-" the thing I detest. I won't mind in the least.
An author who undertakes to criticize publicly another's religious faith and practice has the obligation, in the first instance, to understand it.
... and the anti-Mormon saith unto them: I am no anti-Mormon, for there is none — and thus he whispereth in their ears.
#12
Posted 28 December 2010 - 10:48 AM
LDSToronto, on 27 December 2010 - 08:33 PM, said:
H.
I think that you are setting the bar too high with metaphysical insight. LDS leaders appear to be making some baby steps toward common sense and good judgment.
#13
Posted 28 December 2010 - 11:06 AM
LDSToronto, on 27 December 2010 - 08:33 PM, said:
H.
Now, you wouldn't want that to happen, would you???
He is my Lord. He is my Life. He is all I desire to be.
Speaking against the NATURE of sin: To the last I grapple with thee,
From Hell's Heart I stab thee; For Hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee...
#14
Posted 28 December 2010 - 03:43 PM
LDSToronto, on 27 December 2010 - 08:33 PM, said:
Many people, I'd say most, would be unable to obey the laws associated with the higher views of exaltation, etc. But, knowing more and not meeting that threshold, they'd receive a much harsher condemnation than doing exactly the same things (or less) without the knowledge.
God reveals these tings to each of us individually as we prepare for them. Those who do not receive them, are not expected to obey.
The "teasers" you lament are designed, I believe, to prod us into acting and asking, to preparing ourselves to get them, and that is exactly what God wants:
Moses 1:39 said:
Lehi
— Walter Karp
#15
Posted 29 December 2010 - 08:53 AM
Ahab, on 28 December 2010 - 11:06 AM, said:
Now, you wouldn't want that to happen, would you???
lol! Nice try, but I guess just as plausible as any other reason...
H.
We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. Therefore, to the same natural effects we must, so far as possible, assign the same causes. --Sir Isaac Newton
Entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity --Father William of Ockham
#16
Posted 29 December 2010 - 08:58 AM
Stargazer, on 27 December 2010 - 11:49 PM, said:
1. If we do not get it the same way he got it, we will not be able to hold onto it -- or appreciate it
2. That the world would trample it under their feet, to their own detriment
But wouldn't this apply to all things the prophets reveal to us? I go to the temple, follow the word of wisdom, avoid pornography, and do a host of other things, and know a host of other things, based on what was revealed to prophets; I obtained none of those things the same way that the prophets obtained them.
H.
We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. Therefore, to the same natural effects we must, so far as possible, assign the same causes. --Sir Isaac Newton
Entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity --Father William of Ockham
#17
Posted 29 December 2010 - 09:01 AM
LeSellers, on 28 December 2010 - 03:43 PM, said:
God reveals these tings to each of us individually as we prepare for them. Those who do not receive them, are not expected to obey.
Perhaps, but then again, I'd say the temple covenants are quite all encompassing. Living up to those covenants, with any degree of discipline that approaches perfection, is pretty hard to to already. I'd suggest that exposing more of a view of eternity, as opposed to the limited view that we currently have, would motivate us, not hinder us, in our quest to follow God's commandments.
H.
We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. Therefore, to the same natural effects we must, so far as possible, assign the same causes. --Sir Isaac Newton
Entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity --Father William of Ockham
#18
Posted 29 December 2010 - 03:11 PM
LDSToronto, on 29 December 2010 - 09:01 AM, said:
H.
Edited by Scott Lloyd, 29 December 2010 - 05:12 PM.
Nobody gives you all the facts all at once, leastwise anti-Mormons and hostile critics. If selective focus or emphasis amounts to deceit, they are the worst of offenders.
If I detest anything as virulently as anti-Mormons obviously detest Mormonism, feel free to label me as "anti-" the thing I detest. I won't mind in the least.
An author who undertakes to criticize publicly another's religious faith and practice has the obligation, in the first instance, to understand it.
... and the anti-Mormon saith unto them: I am no anti-Mormon, for there is none — and thus he whispereth in their ears.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




