Jump to content


President Packer's Christmastime talk in his home ward


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 Scott Lloyd

Scott Lloyd

    Shameless and unabashed user of an iPod touch at church

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,871 posts

Posted 27 December 2010 - 11:29 AM

There's been some talk about the address President Packer gave on Dec. 19 at his home ward.

I thought the board might be interested in the Church News report of his talk.
To whom it may concern: If you feel inclined to do anything for or in behalf of me after I die -- or even while I'm living, for that matter -- that is comparable in intent to Mormon vicarious baptisms or other ordinances for the dead, feel free. I would even regard it as a magnanimous gesture.  I would appreciate the thought in any case.
Nobody gives you all the facts all at once, leastwise anti-Mormons and hostile critics. If selective focus or emphasis amounts to deceit, they are the worst of offenders.
If I detest anything as virulently as anti-Mormons obviously detest Mormonism, feel free to label me as "anti-" the thing I detest. I won't mind in the least.
An author who undertakes to criticize publicly another's religious faith and practice has the obligation, in the first instance, to understand it.
... and the anti-Mormon saith unto them: I am no anti-Mormon, for there is none — and thus he whispereth in their ears.

#2 mfbukowski

mfbukowski

    Declares a Day of Rest

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,298 posts

Posted 27 December 2010 - 12:31 PM

View PostScott Lloyd, on 27 December 2010 - 11:29 AM, said:

There's been some talk about the address President Packer gave on Dec. 19 at his home ward.

I thought the board might be interested in the Church News report of his talk.
Especially interesting to me was his calculation that Jesus was one of at least 6 siblings.

Also interesting was the statement, of course consistent with established doctrine, was that there was "no beginning and no end".  That is a very straightforward statement which clearly separates us from Creedal Christians.

Also heart warming that Sister Packer complimented the Deacons.   They won't forget that one!

I can't imagine what it would be like to be Elder Packer's bishop!  Yikes!

Edited by mfbukowski, 27 December 2010 - 12:31 PM.

"I see Religion as creating a language to speak of the divine and sacred. Since I see creating this language as a creative act, ...  creating a certain view of heaven and earth, a living 'image' of God and Man and their story, past, present and future." - Calmoriah

My Blog: Theomorphic Man http://theomorphicman.blogspot.com/

#3 Scott Lloyd

Scott Lloyd

    Shameless and unabashed user of an iPod touch at church

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,871 posts

Posted 27 December 2010 - 01:23 PM

I was struck by the fervency of his testimony. To me it was reminiscent of the witness of Christ that Bruce R. McConkie bore in general conference not long before he died.

Also, the expression about the view of eternity that prophets and apostles have gave me pause. It seemed that President Packer was saying about as much as he appropriately could on that subject without going into further detail.
To whom it may concern: If you feel inclined to do anything for or in behalf of me after I die -- or even while I'm living, for that matter -- that is comparable in intent to Mormon vicarious baptisms or other ordinances for the dead, feel free. I would even regard it as a magnanimous gesture.  I would appreciate the thought in any case.
Nobody gives you all the facts all at once, leastwise anti-Mormons and hostile critics. If selective focus or emphasis amounts to deceit, they are the worst of offenders.
If I detest anything as virulently as anti-Mormons obviously detest Mormonism, feel free to label me as "anti-" the thing I detest. I won't mind in the least.
An author who undertakes to criticize publicly another's religious faith and practice has the obligation, in the first instance, to understand it.
... and the anti-Mormon saith unto them: I am no anti-Mormon, for there is none — and thus he whispereth in their ears.

#4 Ahab

Ahab

    Brings Forth Plants

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,801 posts

Posted 27 December 2010 - 01:26 PM

View Postmfbukowski, on 27 December 2010 - 12:31 PM, said:

I can't imagine what it would be like to be Elder Packer's bishop!  Yikes!
It would be a bishop's dream, because he would already be doing everything the bishop would want him to do as an active member in the Church.
I desire to show you who I am by showing you who I follow.
He is my Lord.  He is my Life.  He is all I desire to be.

Speaking against the NATURE of sin:  To the last I grapple with thee,
From Hell's Heart I stab thee; For Hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee...

#5 Duncan

Duncan

    Canadian Jester and Knowledge Navigator

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,654 posts

Posted 27 December 2010 - 04:16 PM

View PostAhab, on 27 December 2010 - 01:26 PM, said:

It would be a bishop's dream, because he would already be doing everything the bishop would want him to do as an active member in the Church.


I used to know a fellow who was at one time President Joseph Fielding Smith's home teacher. This teenager at the time went out and had to teach Pres. Smith the article that he had written so what is this kid going to say, but after it was all over Pres. Smith said that it was nice to hear how what he wrote was being received by members
“I know that God lives. I know that Jesus lives; for I have seen Him. I know that this is the Church of God, and that it is founded on Jesus Christ, our Redeemer. I testify to you of these things as one that knows—as one of the Apostles of the Lord Jesus Christ that can bear witness to you today in the presence of the Lord that He lives and that He will live, and will come to reign on the earth, to sway an undisputed sceptre”.
President George Q. Cannon
(Oct. 6, 1896, DW 53:610)

#6 ERMD

ERMD

    Nothing else matters when you can't breathe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,764 posts

Posted 27 December 2010 - 04:47 PM

Part of his testimony of Christ struck me.

"...I know him when I see him..."

Significant.

Edited by ERMD, 27 December 2010 - 04:48 PM.

Fighting side by side, hand in hand.

#7 LDSToronto

LDSToronto

    Expert in Morality

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,236 posts

Posted 27 December 2010 - 08:27 PM

"Everything about the celebration, except the things that are creeping in now that are almost pagan, is for families, for little children"

What's he talking about - almost all of Christmas is pagan; I'm curious what Pres. Packer finds to be creeping in...

H.
When you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras --Dr. Theodore Woodward

We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. Therefore, to the same natural effects we must, so far as possible, assign the same causes. --Sir Isaac Newton

Entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity  --Father William of Ockham

#8 LDSToronto

LDSToronto

    Expert in Morality

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,236 posts

Posted 27 December 2010 - 08:33 PM

View PostScott Lloyd, on 27 December 2010 - 01:23 PM, said:

Also, the expression about the view of eternity that prophets and apostles have gave me pause. It seemed that President Packer was saying about as much as he appropriately could on that subject without going into further detail.

I found that striking, too, and I find myself asking the question, "Why not reveal more?" If the prophets and apostles have this view of eternity, wouldn't it make sense to share it with mankind, and not simply reveal 'teasers'?

H.
When you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras --Dr. Theodore Woodward

We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. Therefore, to the same natural effects we must, so far as possible, assign the same causes. --Sir Isaac Newton

Entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity  --Father William of Ockham

#9 Sky

Sky

    Separates Water & Dry Land

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,154 posts

Posted 27 December 2010 - 09:20 PM

I thought that President Packer gave an awe-inspiring testimony.  How blessed we are to have living apostles and prophets on the earth!  They are definitely needed.  Its too bad that he is so often misunderstood and maligned.
The fundamental principles of our religion are the testimony of the Apostles and Prophets, concerning Jesus Christ, that He died, was buried, and rose again the third day, and ascended into heaven; and all other things which pertain to our religion are only appendages to it.  -Joseph Smith

#10 Stargazer

Stargazer

    Observing the heavens since 1951.

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,448 posts

Posted 27 December 2010 - 11:49 PM

View PostLDSToronto, on 27 December 2010 - 08:33 PM, said:

I found that striking, too, and I find myself asking the question, "Why not reveal more?" If the prophets and apostles have this view of eternity, wouldn't it make sense to share it with mankind, and not simply reveal 'teasers'?

H.

I am convinced that is for two reasons:

1. If we do not get it the same way he got it, we will not be able to hold onto it -- or appreciate it
2. That the world would trample it under their feet, to their own detriment

With regard to #1, see this.

Quote

There is no doubt, if a person lives according to the revelations given to God's people, he may have the Spirit of the Lord to signify to him his will, and to guide and to direct him in the discharge of his duties, in his temporal as well as his spiritual exercises. I am satisfied, however, that in this respect, we live far beneath our privileges. (Discourses of Brigham Young, p. 32)

What we receive without effort, we only lightly esteem.
do {} while (true)
My personal blog | My YouTube Channel | Linked-In Profile | My LDS Profile
Twitter: @IWasAboutToSay

#11 Scott Lloyd

Scott Lloyd

    Shameless and unabashed user of an iPod touch at church

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,871 posts

Posted 28 December 2010 - 10:31 AM

View PostStargazer, on 27 December 2010 - 11:49 PM, said:

I am convinced that is for two reasons:

1. If we do not get it the same way he got it, we will not be able to hold onto it -- or appreciate it
2. That the world would trample it under their feet, to their own detriment

With regard to #1, see this.



What we receive without effort, we only lightly esteem.
Well said.

To this I would add the citation from 1 Corinthians 2:11 (Joseph Smith Translation):

Quote

For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man except he has the Spirit of God.

Also, verse 14,

Quote

But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

To whom it may concern: If you feel inclined to do anything for or in behalf of me after I die -- or even while I'm living, for that matter -- that is comparable in intent to Mormon vicarious baptisms or other ordinances for the dead, feel free. I would even regard it as a magnanimous gesture.  I would appreciate the thought in any case.
Nobody gives you all the facts all at once, leastwise anti-Mormons and hostile critics. If selective focus or emphasis amounts to deceit, they are the worst of offenders.
If I detest anything as virulently as anti-Mormons obviously detest Mormonism, feel free to label me as "anti-" the thing I detest. I won't mind in the least.
An author who undertakes to criticize publicly another's religious faith and practice has the obligation, in the first instance, to understand it.
... and the anti-Mormon saith unto them: I am no anti-Mormon, for there is none — and thus he whispereth in their ears.

#12 PaulBoyerFan

PaulBoyerFan

    Newbie: Without form, and void

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 53 posts

Posted 28 December 2010 - 10:48 AM

View PostLDSToronto, on 27 December 2010 - 08:33 PM, said:

I found that striking, too, and I find myself asking the question, "Why not reveal more?" If the prophets and apostles have this view of eternity, wouldn't it make sense to share it with mankind, and not simply reveal 'teasers'?

H.

I think that you are setting the bar too high with metaphysical insight.  LDS leaders appear to be making some baby steps toward common sense and good judgment.

#13 Ahab

Ahab

    Brings Forth Plants

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,801 posts

Posted 28 December 2010 - 11:06 AM

View PostLDSToronto, on 27 December 2010 - 08:33 PM, said:

I found that striking, too, and I find myself asking the question, "Why not reveal more?" If the prophets and apostles have this view of eternity, wouldn't it make sense to share it with mankind, and not simply reveal 'teasers'?

H.
The "view" the prophets and apostles have is "the eternal perspective", and if we saw what was waiting for us later most of us would kill ourselves to get there.

Now, you wouldn't want that to happen, would you???
I desire to show you who I am by showing you who I follow.
He is my Lord.  He is my Life.  He is all I desire to be.

Speaking against the NATURE of sin:  To the last I grapple with thee,
From Hell's Heart I stab thee; For Hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee...

#14 LeSellers

LeSellers

    Redefining excellence upwards, just to make it a challenge.

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,845 posts

Posted 28 December 2010 - 03:43 PM

View PostLDSToronto, on 27 December 2010 - 08:33 PM, said:

"Why not reveal more?" If the prophets and apostles have this view of eternity, wouldn't it make sense to share it with mankind, and not simply reveal 'teasers'?
Where much is given, much is required.

Many people, I'd say most, would be unable to obey the laws associated with the higher views of exaltation, etc. But, knowing more and not meeting that threshold, they'd receive a much harsher condemnation than doing exactly the same things (or less) without the knowledge.

God reveals these tings to each of us individually as we prepare for them. Those who do not receive them, are not expected to obey.

The "teasers" you lament are designed, I believe, to prod us into acting and asking, to preparing ourselves to get them, and that is exactly what God wants:

Moses 1:39 said:

For behold, this is my work and my glory, to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man.
God does not want us to fail.

Lehi
The public school system: "Usually a twelve year sentence of mind control. Crushing creativity, smashing individualism, encouraging collectivism and compromise, destroying the exercise of intellectual inquiry, twisting it instead into meek subservience to authority".
— Walter Karp

#15 LDSToronto

LDSToronto

    Expert in Morality

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,236 posts

Posted 29 December 2010 - 08:53 AM

View PostAhab, on 28 December 2010 - 11:06 AM, said:

The "view" the prophets and apostles have is "the eternal perspective", and if we saw what was waiting for us later most of us would kill ourselves to get there.

Now, you wouldn't want that to happen, would you???

lol! Nice try, but I guess just as plausible as any other reason...

H.
When you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras --Dr. Theodore Woodward

We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. Therefore, to the same natural effects we must, so far as possible, assign the same causes. --Sir Isaac Newton

Entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity  --Father William of Ockham

#16 LDSToronto

LDSToronto

    Expert in Morality

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,236 posts

Posted 29 December 2010 - 08:58 AM

View PostStargazer, on 27 December 2010 - 11:49 PM, said:

I am convinced that is for two reasons:

1. If we do not get it the same way he got it, we will not be able to hold onto it -- or appreciate it
2. That the world would trample it under their feet, to their own detriment

But wouldn't this apply to all things the prophets reveal to us? I go to the temple, follow the word of wisdom, avoid pornography, and do a host of other things, and know a host of other things, based on what was revealed to prophets; I obtained none of those things the same way that the prophets obtained them.

H.
When you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras --Dr. Theodore Woodward

We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. Therefore, to the same natural effects we must, so far as possible, assign the same causes. --Sir Isaac Newton

Entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity  --Father William of Ockham

#17 LDSToronto

LDSToronto

    Expert in Morality

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,236 posts

Posted 29 December 2010 - 09:01 AM

View PostLeSellers, on 28 December 2010 - 03:43 PM, said:

Many people, I'd say most, would be unable to obey the laws associated with the higher views of exaltation, etc. But, knowing more and not meeting that threshold, they'd receive a much harsher condemnation than doing exactly the same things (or less) without the knowledge.

God reveals these tings to each of us individually as we prepare for them. Those who do not receive them, are not expected to obey.

Perhaps, but then again, I'd say the temple covenants are quite all encompassing. Living up to those covenants, with any degree of discipline that approaches perfection, is pretty hard to to already. I'd suggest that exposing more of a view of eternity, as opposed to the limited view that we currently have, would motivate us, not hinder us, in our quest to follow God's commandments.

H.
When you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras --Dr. Theodore Woodward

We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. Therefore, to the same natural effects we must, so far as possible, assign the same causes. --Sir Isaac Newton

Entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity  --Father William of Ockham

#18 Scott Lloyd

Scott Lloyd

    Shameless and unabashed user of an iPod touch at church

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,871 posts

Posted 29 December 2010 - 03:11 PM

View PostLDSToronto, on 29 December 2010 - 09:01 AM, said:

Perhaps, but then again, I'd say the temple covenants are quite all encompassing. Living up to those covenants, with any degree of discipline that approaches perfection, is pretty hard to to already. I'd suggest that exposing more of a view of eternity, as opposed to the limited view that we currently have, would motivate us, not hinder us, in our quest to follow God's commandments.

H.
The typical pattern of the Lord is that the broad view of eternity follows faith, obedience and commitment, not the other way around. A purpose of our mortal existence is to develop faith.

Edited by Scott Lloyd, 29 December 2010 - 05:12 PM.

To whom it may concern: If you feel inclined to do anything for or in behalf of me after I die -- or even while I'm living, for that matter -- that is comparable in intent to Mormon vicarious baptisms or other ordinances for the dead, feel free. I would even regard it as a magnanimous gesture.  I would appreciate the thought in any case.
Nobody gives you all the facts all at once, leastwise anti-Mormons and hostile critics. If selective focus or emphasis amounts to deceit, they are the worst of offenders.
If I detest anything as virulently as anti-Mormons obviously detest Mormonism, feel free to label me as "anti-" the thing I detest. I won't mind in the least.
An author who undertakes to criticize publicly another's religious faith and practice has the obligation, in the first instance, to understand it.
... and the anti-Mormon saith unto them: I am no anti-Mormon, for there is none — and thus he whispereth in their ears.


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users