Posted 26 July 2006 - 01:29 PM
UteFan, on Jul 26 2006, 12:41 PM, said:
I think I'm in agreement with The Dude.Ã??Ã?Â
I don't believe Joseph was killed because he practiced polygamy.�?� But I believe this was the catalyst (led to destruction of the press) that frenzied the mob and directly led to his death.
Without the destruction of the mob, who knows, he had been living with angry mobs for many years. Maybe he could have lived many more.�?� I believe the saints still would have been kicked out of Illinois but maybe JS survives.
It seems to me that the impression, from the mob point of view, was that if you cut off the head, the body dies. I don't think the enemies expected the Church to survive the death of Joseph Smith. The focus was to find any means to isolate and eliminate Joseph. Any workable pretext would have suited them. If polygamy and the Expositor incident hadn't worked, they would have found something else.
Edited by Scott Lloyd, 26 July 2006 - 02:31 PM.
To whom it may concern: If you feel inclined to do anything for or in behalf of me after I die -- or even while I'm living, for that matter -- that is comparable in intent to Mormon vicarious baptisms or other ordinances for the dead, feel free. I would even regard it as a magnanimous gesture. I would appreciate the thought in any case.
Nobody gives you all the facts all at once, leastwise anti-Mormons and hostile critics. If selective focus or emphasis amounts to deceit, they are the worst of offenders.
If I detest anything as virulently as anti-Mormons obviously detest Mormonism, feel free to label me as "anti-" the thing I detest. I won't mind in the least.
An author who undertakes to criticize publicly another's religious faith and practice has the obligation, in the first instance, to understand it.
... and the anti-Mormon saith unto them: I am no anti-Mormon, for there is none — and thus he whispereth in their ears.