Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

77 Excellent

About snowflake

  • Rank
    Seasoned Member: Separates Light & Dark

Recent Profile Visitors

640 profile views
  1. This man has either submitted to Christ as Lord or he hasn't, by going to the library and promoting the LGBTQ agenda i am assuming that he has not given his life to Christ. But you are correct i am assuming this.
  2. Matthew 6: 6:24 No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
  3. Romans 1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 1:23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. 1:24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: 1:25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. 1:28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 1:29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 1:30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 1:31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: 1:32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them. I pray for this lost soul!
  4. Wow......such insight....thanks MF!
  5. Does this creation sequence listed above agree with current "scientific thought" as to how the earth, moon and sun were created. From what I have read the Genesis account would be out of order right?
  6. Do you think that the creation took place in 6 days like Genesis, B O Moses, and Temple ceremony video claim or is that symbolic too? If it was a 6 day creation period, plants appearing on day 3 would be no problem, they can live several days without sunlight.
  7. Fair enough, I'm open to suggestions and insight, I agree that things that appear as contradictions can be explained quite often.
  8. Absolutely, I have wondered about that for years, your thoughts? Jesus said in John 8: 12 that he was the light of the world. 12 Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life. Also in Revelation the newly reborn earth will have no need for a sun or moon but will have the glory of God. Rev 21:23 And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof. Maybe the light on day 1 is from the Glory of the Lamb? Rev 22:5 states: And there shall be no night there; and they need no candle, neither light of the sun; for the Lord God giveth them light: and they shall reign for ever and ever.
  9. The Bible, and Book of Moses have plants coming on day 3, followed by sun, moon and stars on day 4. Lds temple movie has the sun, moon and stars on day 3, plants on day 4, why the contradictions?
  10. Ouch...where do you get the idea that I hate the bible? On the contrary I love the bible, KJV is my favorite! Do you have a response to my question?
  11. I was not aware that the temple drama is different than scripture.....how can I watch the temple drama?
  12. You are correct that on day one God created light, so true I guess they could be living on that light. God is very specific that plants are on day three, then if you read he states that the sun, moon and the stars all come on day 4....seems specific to me.
  13. 11 And I, God, said: Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, the fruit tree yielding fruit, after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed should be in itself upon the earth, and it was so even as I spake. 12 And the earth brought forth grass, every herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed should be in itself, after his kind; and I, God, saw that all things which I had made were good; 13 And the evening and the morning were the third day. 14 And I, God, said: Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven, to divide the day from the night, and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and for years; 15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth; and it was so. 16 And I, God, made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night, and the greater light was the sun, and the lesser light was the moon; and the stars also were made even according to my word. 17 And I, God, set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, 18 And the sun to rule over the day, and the moon to rule over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness; and I, God, saw that all things which I had made were good; 19 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day. Since we know the book of Moses to be the word of God (according to the Articles of faith), how would it be possible that the plants and grasses and fruit trees could survive before the Sun was created?
  14. Evangelical Creation Movie

    I have no problem of learning how cells work, how genes are expressed, how DNA is transcribed and translated, tRNA being copied and transferred to the ribososmes, all the micro machines required to drive the processes of the cell. I think it is absolutely amazing and that is science, learning how things work. How does a "genetic code" become a phenotype, absolutely amazing! In high school I was taught that natural selection was the primary driver of evolution. Then in college I learned that natural selection was incapable of creating any new genetic information and that the primary "mechanism" was genetic mutation....and you seem to agree with me that small errors in the genetic code "point mutations" is not the primary driver of evolution and are incapable of creating new genetic material. Does this "Epigenetics" have a way to create new sections of DNA code? I am not trying to look narrowly but you seem to be dodging my question about what are the mechanisms that drive evolution? When I look at the cell I see design and an intelligent mind behind that design. When looking through the evolutionist's lens it seems to me that they look at the cell and say "wow look at all that random chance, amazing how evolution (magic) can blindly create such an unorganized mess......no mind behind these organisms...just a bunch of organized chemicals interacting....must have been random genetic mutation that created this".....
  15. Evangelical Creation Movie

    Watched the video thank you. A few questions, it appears that evolutionary biology moving away from the traditional natural selection and genetic mutation mechanism that drives macroevolution, is this true? And are these mechanisms being disregarded as incapable of creating new phenotypes? Also "junk DNA" appears to be incorrect, is all genetic information considered useful now?