• Announcements

    • Nemesis

      Contact Us Broken   09/27/2016

      Users, It has come to our attention that the contact us feature on the site is broken.  Please do not use this feature to contact board admins.  Please go through normal channels.  If you are ignored there then assume your request was denied. Also if you try to email us that email address is pretty much ignored.  Also don't contact us to complain, ask for favors, donations, or any other thing that you may think would annoy us.  Nemesis


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


notHagoth7 last won the day on September 16 2016

notHagoth7 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

199 Excellent


About notHagoth7

  • Rank
    Separates Water & Dry Land
  • Birthday 05/21/1964

Contact Methods

  • Website URL

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Are you kidding? Not with Heisenberg Uncertainty and all that...
  • Interests
    Comparative religion, American history, European history, instructional technology, quantum physics, screenwriting.

Recent Profile Visitors

1,857 profile views
  1. And how would Jesus of Nazareth have taught the apostles to feed them? For a day? (Give them a fish?) Or for a lifetime? (Teach them how to fish?) In other words, if he was teaching a congregation to be self-sufficient, they would have bounty - baskets of leftovers...for those less fortunate. That outcome seems much more along the lines of compassion taught in the NT....and elsewhere. Teaching his followers not just to receive...but to also have sufficient to give.
  2. I do. As I alluded to above with Jesus teaching the disciples effective fishing...partnered with things like this verse: https://www.lds.org/scriptures/nt/john/21.25?lang=eng#p24 Essentially, the NT is like the small plates. Reserved largely for recording spiritual, rather than temporal teachings (assuming one can actually divide the two)...and I have considerable cause to believe that the primitive church taught quite a bit of both...including during Jesus of Nazareth's mortal ministry.
  3. ? ? (Perhaps the t-shirt could equally read software engineer...etc.)
  4. ? Yet is that not precisely what happened with reformed Egyptian among the Nephites? And is that not precisely what God was apparently very OK with happening? 32 And now, behold, we have written this record according to our knowledge, in the characters which are called among us the reformed Egyptian, being handed down and altered by us, according to our manner of speech.... 34 But the Lord knoweth...that none other people knoweth our language;...therefore he hath prepared means for the interpretation thereof. Then, if you're comfortable rejecting that notion, perhaps I occasionally post to discomfit the comfortable. ;0) (When no one knows your language, any ideogram *could* mean virtually anything.)
  5. I know almost nothing about Egyptian, or PofGP translation discussions. Just curious whether there's been any discussion in all of that of Abraham perhaps having used/adapted Egyptian similar to how Japanese and Koreans used/use Han/Chinese characters. If so, I would imagine some have already suggested that such a utilization/adaptation might explain some divergences between translations by Egyptologists and Joseph's translation of Abraham. In short, did Abraham himself begin, among his people, a reform of Egyptian writing for Semitic use, a reform continued among his great-grandson Joseph? Two main ancestral prophets of Lehi's people. If so, does that help explain passages such as these? https://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/mosiah/1.2?lang=eng#p1 Are Abraham and Joseph two of the main prophetic "fathers" hereby referred to? (Things like 2 Nephi 3 would suggest so.) Thoughts?
  6. Because their form of writing appears to have been preserved only among the relatively few trained up in the Nephite scribal tradition. Consider the sons of King Benjamin, who, centuries after Nephi, had to be taught the language of their fathers to be able to even read the plates. Very similar to the demise of Tironian notes/shorthand in Europe: Was introduced into Europe contemporary with Hagoth and the stripling warriors, roughly a century after King Benjamin. Was used by scribes in Europe for centuries (although the general European public couldn't discern Tironian). Became a lost art generations ago, with the meaning of many TIronian characters now unknown. You wouldn't know modern shorthand without extensive training. Ditto with reformed Egyptian/Tironian. Fair 'nuf?
  7. Is Steve responsible for the "worlds without number" verbiage in the early portions of the film? If so, is he LDS?
  8. Yep. Contemporary with (a few years after) Hagoth's northbound sailing ship(s) that vanished from Nephite history....supposedly.
  9. Listening. Retract what?
  10. On further reflection, the law of witnesses suggests the need for at least one more...where they and their neighbors had learned from the lessons/mistakes of the previous generation:
  11. IMNSHO, Nephites were involved with this city/battle/battlefield. There is considerable reason to believe that it was the execution of one of their own, early ringleader among ancient-European freedom fighters, which led to this climactic battle. A battle of 12 Roman legions that Jesus apparently alluded to decades later in Palestine. Could point to several more battlefields where Nephites engaged. But don't see the need. As I recall, the key of history is to learn from the mistakes of the past...so we don't repeat them. Fair 'nuf?
  12. Here's a recent comment that mentions Greek references of *kolob**...a language which clearly predates 300 BC. The ancient world, fitting nicely within the window of time you've requested, on various occasions referred to stars (and the like) as God's children/servants. https://www.lds.org/scriptures/ot/job/38.7?lang=eng#p6 https://www.lds.org/scriptures/ot/dan/12.3?lang=eng#p2 See, by way of comparison, the "Metaphorical exegisis" section here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolob Thoughts?
  13. ? I have made no retraction. I stand by every word I have said in this thread. K. Sounds enjoyable, if time/resources/tech access allow. Would you prefer that discussion here in this thread (since such does weigh into the OP's assertion that the BofA preface was somehow misleading)? Or would you prefer a separate thread(s)?
  14. ? I did not retract. One step. Yet none have yet ventured to step forward across the threshold and engage with the content provided/offered.
  15. ? I made no statement of fact that needs retraction. I made a statement of belief that requires no retraction - because it was in direct response to Julie's direct query about what I happen to "believe." I stand behind every statement of fact I subsequently provided. And offered a link that opens the door to hundreds/thousands/millions of corroborating non-LDS references/witnesses of Joseph's veracity. Baffled/intrigued that none have yet opted to comment on what's beyond that initial threshold. Still awaiting substantive forum response to such. Regards.